RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Optimization of left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy using combination of personalized computational modeling and machine-learning
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.12.14.22283450
DO 10.1101/2022.12.14.22283450
A1 Dokuchaev, Arsenii
A1 Chumarnaya, Tatiana
A1 Bazhutina, Anastasia
A1 Khamzin, Svyatoslav
A1 Lebedeva, Viktoria
A1 Lyubimtseva, Tamara
A1 Zubarev, Stepan
A1 Lebedev, Dmitry
A1 Solovyova, Olga
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/16/2022.12.14.22283450.abstract
AB Background Up to 30-50% of selected patients with chronic heart failure do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Optimization of pacing lead placement in ventricles remains a challenge.Objective We utilize a machine learning (ML) classifier to predict the position of an optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing site maximizing the probability of CRT response for a certain patient.Materials and Methods Retrospective data from 57 patients with implanted CRT devices were utilized. Positive response to CRT was defined by a 10% improvement in the LV ejection fraction in a year after implantation. For each patient, a personalized model of ventricular activation and ECG was developed based on MRI and CT images. The total ventricular activation time, QRS duration and electrical dyssynchrony indices during intrinsic rhythm and biventricular (BiV) pacing with clinical pacing lead position (ref-LP) were computed and used in combination with clinical data to train the ML algorithm. We built a logistic regression classifier predicting CRT response with a high ROC AUC=0.84 and an average accuracy of 0.77. It generates a ML-score estimating the probability of CRT response. ML-scores were computed from model-driven features for varying LV pacing sites. Then Bayesian optimization was used to interpolate the ML-score over the available LV surface and an optimal LV lead position for BiV pacing that maximizes ML-score (ML-LP) was defined.Results The optimal LV pacing site position increased the average ML-score by 17% in the patient cohort. Moreover, 11 out of 34 (20%) non-responders classified as true negative at ref-LP were re-classified as positive at ML-LP. In a patient group (n=14, 25% of the cohort) with LV pacing lead deployed in close proximity to the optimal position, the ratio of responders to non-responders was three times higher than in the entire cohort.Conclusion We have developed a new technique based on simulations and ML to define an optimal position for LV lead for BiV pacing maximizing the ML-score of CRT response on the available LV epicardial surface. This technique demonstrates a high potential for the improvement of CRT outcome with guided lead implantation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementRussian Science Foundation grant No. 19-14-00134.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Almazov National Medical Research Centre Ethical CommitteeI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors