PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Chapleau, Richard R. TI - Genome-wide Associations, Polygenic Risk, and Mendelian Randomization Reveal Limited Interactions between John Henryism and Cynicism AID - 10.1101/2022.12.12.22283345 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.12.12.22283345 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/14/2022.12.12.22283345.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/14/2022.12.12.22283345.full AB - Chronic occupational stress and an individual’s reaction to that stress often lead to burnout syndrome. We sought to use genetics to evaluate what, if any, interactions exist between John Henryism (JH) and cynicism in hopes of clarifying holistic risk factors of burnout syndrome. We performed genome-wide association studies in a discover phase with 1,852 samples and validated associations in a replication phase of 465 samples, both from the CARDIA study, and used supervised machine learning to developing genetic risk algorithms. We identified 933 genetic associations and developed a classification algorithm for high cynicism using machine learning with areas under the receiver operator characteristics curve greater than 0.7. We found significant genetic components to these traits but no evidence of an interaction between JH and cynicism, so while there may be a genetic risk component, JH does not appear to contribute to burnout risk.Competing Interest StatementRichard Chapleau is the Principal Geneticist of NeuroStat Analytical Solutions, a for-profit company.Funding StatementNo explicit funding was received for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed and approved by WCG IRB (Study number 1332892) for human subjects research oversight.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesGenotype and phenotype data that support this study can be obtained from dbGAP using accession numbers phs000285.v3.p2, pht001579.v2.p2, pht001634v2.p2, pht001786.v2.p2, phg000092.v2, and phg000098.v2. GWAS summary statistics based created from GWAS on the training dataset are unavailable for public posting, per the CARDIA data use agreement. The summary statistics, ML code and models are available from the authors upon reasonable request.