PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rao, Longfeng AU - Horn, Nils AU - Meister, Nadja AU - Preiss, Stefan AU - Taylor, William R. AU - Santuz, Alessandro AU - Schütz, Pascal TI - Comparable in vivo joint kinematics between self-reported stable and unstable knees after TKA can be explained by muscular adaptation strategies: a retrospective observational study AID - 10.1101/2022.12.12.22283339 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.12.12.22283339 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/13/2022.12.12.22283339.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/13/2022.12.12.22283339.full AB - Background Postoperative knee instability is one of the major reasons accounting for unsatisfactory outcomes, as well as a major failure mechanism leading to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision. Nevertheless, subjective knee instability is not well defined clinically, plausibly because the relationships between instability and implant kinematics during functional activities of daily living remain unclear. Although muscles play a critical role in supporting the dynamic stability of the knee joint, the influence of joint instability on muscle synergy patterns is poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the impact of self-reported joint instability on tibiofemoral kinematics and muscle synergy patterns after TKA during functional gait activities of daily living.Methods Tibiofemoral kinematics and muscle synergy patterns were examined during level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent in eight self-reported unstable knees after TKA (3M:5F, 68.9±8.3 years, BMI 26.1±3.2 kg/m2, 31.9±20.4 months postoperatively), and compared against ten stable TKA knees (7M:3F, 62.6±6.8 years, 33.9±8.5 months postoperatively, BMI 29.4±4.8 kg/m2). For each knee joint, clinical assessments of postoperative outcome were performed, while joint kinematics were evaluated using moving video-fluoroscopy, and muscle synergy patterns were recorded using electromyography.Results Our results reveal that average condylar A-P translations, rotations, as well as their ranges of motion were comparable between stable and unstable groups. However, the unstable group exhibited more heterogeneous muscle synergy patterns and prolonged activation of knee flexors compared to the stable group. In addition, subjects who reported instability events during measurement showed distinct, subject-specific tibiofemoral kinematic patterns in the early/mid-swing phase of gait.Conclusions Our findings suggest that accurate movement analysis is sensitive for detecting acute instability events, but might be less robust in identifying general joint instability. Conversely, muscle synergy patterns seem to be able to identify muscular adaptation associated with underlying chronic knee instability.Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialBASEC no. 2019-01242Funding StatementThe authors would like to thank the Orthopaedics Hospital, Dongxiang, China, for financially supporting Longfeng Rao during his PhD.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Kantonale Ethikkommission Zurich Geschaftsfuhrer Stampfenbachstrasse 121 Postfach 8090 Zurich admin.kek@kek.zh.chI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analysed in this study are included in the manuscript and supplementary data files. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000584582