RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Mpox knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intended behaviour in the general population and men who are gay, bisexual, and who have sex with men
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.12.07.22283201
DO 10.1101/2022.12.07.22283201
A1 Smith, Louise E
A1 Potts, Henry WW
A1 Brainard, Julii
A1 May, Tom
A1 Oliver, Isabel
A1 Amlôt, Richard
A1 Yardley, Lucy
A1 Rubin, G James
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/09/2022.12.07.22283201.abstract
AB Objectives To investigate rates of mpox beliefs, knowledge, and intended behaviours in the general population and in gay, bisexual or other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), and factors associated with intended behaviours. To test the impact of motivational messages (vs a factual control) on intended behaviours.Design Cross-sectional online survey including a nested randomised controlled trial.Setting Data collected 5 September to 6 October 2022.Participants Participants were aged 18 years and over and lived in the UK (general population). In addition, GBMSM were male, and gay, bisexual or had sex with men. The general population sample was recruited through a market research company. GBMSM were recruited through a market research company, the dating app Grindr, and targeted adverts on Meta (Facebook and Instagram).Main outcome measures Intention to self-isolate, seek medical help, stop all sexual contact, share details of recent sexual contacts, and accept vaccination.Results Socio-demographic characteristics differed by sample. There was no effect of very brief motivational messaging on behavioural intentions. Respondents from Grindr and Meta were more likely to intend to seek help immediately, completely stop sexual behaviour and be vaccinated or intend to be vaccinated, but being less likely to intend to self-isolate (ps<0.001). In the general population sample, intending to carry out protective behaviours was generally associated with being female, older, having less financial hardship, greater worry, higher perceived risk to others, and higher perceived susceptibility to and severity of mpox (ps<0.001). There were fewer associations with behaviours in the Grindr sample, possibly due to reduced power.Conclusions GBMSM were more likely to intend to enact protective behaviours, except for self-isolation. This may reflect targeted public health efforts and engagement with this group. Associations with socio-economic factors suggests that providing financial support may encourage people to engage with protective behaviours.STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONSAnonymous cross-sectional survey in large samples of the general population and men who are gay, bisexual, or have sex with men (recruited from a market research company, the dating app Grindr, and targeted adverts on Meta [Facebook and Instagram]).Data collection occurred over a short period (5 September to 6 October 2022) during the mpox outbreak.Responses may have been affected by social desirability or recall bias, although the anonymous nature of the survey should mitigate this somewhat.Socio-demographic characteristics differed by sample. Participants recruited from Grindr and Meta were more likely to be working, highly educated, of higher socio-economic grade, and have less financial hardship.We measured behavioural intentions. Rates of engagement with behaviours may be lower. Factors associated with intentions should still be valid.Competing Interest StatementHWWP has received additional salary support from Public Health England and NHS England and receives funding from the National Institute of Health Research. HWWP receives consultancy fees to his employer from Ipsos MORI and has a PhD student who works at and has fees paid by AstraZeneca. GJR has acted as an expert witness in an unrelated case involving Bayer PLC, supported by LS. IO and RA are employees of UKHSA.Funding StatementLS, JB, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency, King's College London and the University of East Anglia. Additionally, IO, LY, TM and RA are funded by the NIHR HPRU in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, a partnership between UKHSA and the University of Bristol. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, UKHSA, or the Department of Health and Social Care. The study was funded by NIHR. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for this study was given by the King's College London Psychiatry, Nursing and Midwifery Research Ethics Panel (reference number: LRS/DP-21/22-32287).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymised data will be made available online when the manuscript is published in a peer-reviewed journal.