PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Johnson, Grant AU - Gregorchuk, Branden S.J. AU - Zubrzycki, Arek AU - Kolsun, Kurt AU - Meyers, Adrienne F.A. AU - Sandstrom, Paul A. AU - Becker, Michael G. TI - Clinical Evaluation of the GeneXpert<sup>®</sup> Xpert<sup>®</sup> Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV <em>PLUS</em> Combination Test AID - 10.1101/2022.11.07.22281957 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.11.07.22281957 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/05/2022.11.07.22281957.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/05/2022.11.07.22281957.full AB - The GeneXpert® Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV PLUS combination test (PLUS Assay) received Health Canada approval in January 2022. The PLUS Assay is similar to the SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test, with modifications to improve assay robustness against circulating and emerging variants. The performance characteristics of the PLUS Assay were assessed at the Lakeridge Health Oshawa Hospital Centre and the National Microbiology Laboratory of Canada. The PLUS Assay was directly compared to the SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test using SARS-CoV-2 culture from five variants and remnant clinical specimens collected across the COVID-19 pandemic. This included 50 clinical specimens negative for all pathogens, 110 clinical specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza B, RSVA, and/or RSVB and an additional 11 mixed samples to screen for target interactions. The PLUS Assay showed a high percent agreement with the widely used SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test. Based on these findings, the PLUS Assay and the Xpert SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV combination test results are largely consistent with no observed difference in sensitivity, specificity, or time to result when challenged with various SARS-CoV-2 variants. The reported Ct values provided by the new PLUS Assay was also unchanged, with the exception of a possible 1-2 decrease reported Ct for RSVA across a limited sample size.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of The Public Health Agency of Canada waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll primary research data used to generate this manuscript are included in-text and within Supplementary file 1.