PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Elton, David AU - Zhang, Meng TI - Low back pain care pathways – is the last provider seen more important than the first: A retrospective cohort study AID - 10.1101/2022.10.27.22281624 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.10.27.22281624 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/22/2022.10.27.22281624.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/22/2022.10.27.22281624.full AB - Background The associations between the type of health care provider (HCP) initially contacted by an individual with low back pain (LBP), guideline concordance, and cost of care are well understood. Less is known about types of HCP that become involved after the initial HCP, particularly the last HCP seen. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine sequence patterns in the types of HCP involved in an episode of LBP, exposure to 13 types of services, and total cost.Methods A US national sample of commercially insured individuals with a single episode of non-surgical LBP occurring in 2017-2019 was analyzed using episode of care unit of analysis. The primary independent variable was the type of initial contact HCP. Dependent measures included types of subsequent HCPs involved in an episode of LBP, rate of use of 13 types of health care services, and total cost.Results 503,958 individuals aged 18 years and older initially contacted 196,522 different HCPs for an episode of non-surgical LBP. 30.2% of individuals saw a second HCP, 11.8% a third, 5.2% a fourth and 2.5% a fifth. Compared to primary care providers (PCP) (71.0% of episodes), when chiropractors (DC) were the initial contact HCP they were the most likely to be the only and last HCP seen (84.0% of episodes) (risk ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.19). DCs were also the most likely to be the last HCP seen when the second HCP in an episode (72.7%) (1.10, 1.09-1.12), the third HCP (67.7%) (1.10, 1.08-1.13), or the fourth HCP (61.6%) (1.13, 1.08-1.17). Physical therapists (PT), while less likely than PCPs to be the only and last HCP seen (60.0%) (0.84, 0.83-0.86), were more likely than PCPs to be the last HCP when the second (70.9%) (1.08, 1.06-1.09), third (63.2%) (1.03, 1.00-1.06), or fourth HCP (60.7%) (1.11, 1.06-1.16) seen during an episode. PTs were the only type of HCP involved in more episodes as the second HCP (7,344) than as the initial HCP (5,114).Conclusions DCs are the most likely to be the last HCP seen for an episode of non-surgical LBP. PTs are as likely as DCs to be the last HCP seen except when initially contacted by an individual with LBP. There are numerous potential confounders and limitations to consider when interpreting this novel finding.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:A review was performed to assess compliance with de-identification requirements and as it was determined the data was de-identified or a Limited Data Set in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and customer requirements, the UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research Affairs determined that this study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptLBPLow back painUSUnited StatesCPGClinical practice guidelinePCPPrimary care providerDCDoctor of ChiropracticPTPhysical TherapistLAcLicensed acupuncturistHCPHealth care providerADIArea Deprivation IndexWTPWillingness to paySTROBEStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyETG®Episode Treatment Group®ERG®Episode Risk Group®ACPAmerican College of PhysiciansRRRisk ratioOROdds ratioCIConfidence intervalCMTChiropractic manipulative treatmentACActive careMTManual therapy