RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Validity of deep learning algorithms for detecting wheezes and crackles from lung sound recordings in adults
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.11.18.22282442
DO 10.1101/2022.11.18.22282442
A1 Melbye, Hasse
A1 Ravn, Johan
A1 Pabiszczak, Mikolaj
A1 Bongo, Lars Ailo
A1 Aviles Solis, Juan Carlos
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/18/2022.11.18.22282442.abstract
AB We aimed at evaluating deep learning algorithms for detecting wheezes and crackles developed based on sound files from 4033 adults in two samples of sound files not used in the algorithm development. In sample A, ground truth was established by experienced raters in 615 files from the Tromsø population study. Sample B contained 120 sound files from a previous interobserver study with ground truth determined by four experts. The algorithms’ probability scores for wheezes and crackles were evaluated against the ground truth by calculating Area Under Curve (AUC). Agreements between the algorithm and the human annotations were also assessed by Kappa statistics. In sample A the AUC was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 – 0.92) for wheezes and 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 – 0.92) for crackles. The kappa agreement between dichotomized labelling and the ground truth was 0.63 (95% CI 0.56 – 0.71) for wheezes and 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 – 0.75) for crackles. The corresponding kappa agreements between the human raters were 0.47. In sample B, an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 – 1.0) was reached for wheezes and 0.95 (95% CI 0.89 – 1.0) for crackles with corresponding kappas of 0.78 (95% CI 0.58 – 0.99) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.59 – 0.92). The corresponding mean kappas between the ground truth and 24 observers were 0.68 and 0.55. The algorithm agreed substantially with ground truth, and with higher kappa agreements than observed between human annotators.Competing Interest StatementThe results of this work will be used by the Medsensio AS company where JR is CTO. JR and LAB have shares in Medsensio AS. MP is an employee in Medsensio AS. HM and JCAS have done paid work for Medsensio AS.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Regional Ethical Committee of North Norway gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesResearchers can apply for access to the The Tromsø Study data at: https://uit.no/research/tromsostudy