PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Vinnicombe, Soo
AU  - Noyes, Jane
TI  - A review of reviews exploring patient and public involvement in population health research
AID  - 10.1101/2022.11.16.22282319
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.11.16.22282319
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/16/2022.11.16.22282319.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/16/2022.11.16.22282319.full
AB  - Introduction Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly seen as something that is integral to research and of importance to research funders. There is general recognition that PPI is the right thing to do for both moral and practical reasons. The aim of this review of reviews is to examine how PPI can be done ‘properly’ by looking at the evidence that exists from published reviews and assessing it against the UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research, as well as examining the specific features of population health research that can make PPI more challenging.Methods A review of reviews was carried out following the 5-stage Framework Synthesis method.Results In total 31 reviews were included. There is a lack of current research or clarity around Governance and Impact when findings are mapped against UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research. It was also clear that there is little knowledge around PPI with under-represented groups. There are gaps in knowledge about how to ensure key specific attributes of population health research are addressed for PPI team members – particularly around how to deal with complexity and the data-driven nature of the research. Two tools were produced for researchers and PPI members to further improve their PPI activity within population health research and health research more generally: A framework of recommended actions to address PPI in population health research, and guidance on integrating PPI based on the UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research.Conclusions Facilitating PPI in population health research is challenging due to the nature of this type of research and there is far less evidence on how to do PPI well in this context. The tools can help researchers identify key aspects of PPI that can be integrated when designing PPI within projects. Findings also highlight specific areas where more research or discussion is needed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementGrand awarded to JN. Funded by The National Centre for Population Health and Wellbing Research, Wales, UK with a grant from Health and Care Research Wales. The funder paid no role in the conduct of the review. http://www.healthandcareresearchwales.org/Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a review of published reviews. Source data came from published reviews of published studies. The source reviews are referenced in full in the manuscriptI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.ALSPACAvon Longitudinal Study of Parents and ChildrenCO90sChildren of the 90sCPHNational Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing ResearchHCRWHealth and Care Research WalesHEHealth EconomicsHTAHealth Technology AssessmentIKTIntegrated knowledge translationOCAPOriginal Cohort Advisory PanelPPEETPublic and Patient Engagement Evaluation ToolPPEPatient and Public Engagement/ Public and Patient EngagementPPIPatient and Public Involvement / Public and Patient Involvement