RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Brain and molecular mechanisms underlying the nonlinear association between close friendships, mental health, and cognition in children
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.11.02.22281840
DO 10.1101/2022.11.02.22281840
A1 Shen, Chun
A1 Rolls, Edmund T.
A1 Xiang, Shitong
A1 Langley, Christelle
A1 Sahakian, Barbara J.
A1 Cheng, Wei
A1 Feng, Jianfeng
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/02/2022.11.02.22281840.abstract
AB Close friendships are important for mental health and cognition in late childhood. However, whether the more close friends the better, and the underlying neurobiological mechanisms are unknown. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Developmental study, we identified nonlinear associations between the number of close friends, mental health, cognition, and brain structure. Although few close friends were associated with poor mental health, low cognitive functions and small areas of the social brain (e.g., the orbitofrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, the anterior insula and the temporo-parietal junction), increasing the number of close friends beyond a level (around 5) was no longer associated with better mental health and larger cortical areas, and was even related to lower cognition. In children having no more than 5 close friends, the cortical areas related to the number of close friends revealed correlations with the density of μ-opioid receptors and the expression of OPRM1 and OPRK1, and could partly mediate the association between the number of close friends, ADHD symptoms, and crystalized intelligence. Longitudinal analyses showed that both too few and too many close friends at baseline were associated with more ADHD symptoms and lower crystalized intelligence 2 years later. Additionally, we found friendship network size was nonlinearly associated with well-being and academic performance in an independent social network dataset of middle school students. These findings challenge the traditional idea of “the more, the better”, and provide insights into potential brain and molecular mechanisms.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementC.S. is supported by grants from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 82101617). W.C. is supported by grants from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 82071997), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No. 21QA1408700). J.F. is supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC1312904 and No. 2019YFA0709502), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018SHZDZX01), ZJ Lab, Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology, and the 111 Project (No. B18015).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:In ABCD, research procedures and ethical guidelines were followed in accordance with the Institutional Review Boards. In the social network dataset, the research protocol was approved by the Princeton University Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe ABCD data used in this study is Data Release 4.0 (http://dx.doi.org/10.15154/1523041). The data are available by request from the NIMH Data Archive (https://data-archive.nimh.nih.gov/abcd). The social network dataset is conducted among students in 56 middle schools in New Jersey, the United States. This dataset is publicly available (https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/civicleads/studies/37070).