RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of the Peterborough Public Health COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Self-Report Tool: Implications for COVID-19 Surveillance
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.10.28.22281659
DO 10.1101/2022.10.28.22281659
A1 Smith, Erin
A1 Pigeau, Carolyn
A1 Ahmadian-Yazdi, Jamal
A1 Kharbouch, Mohamed
A1 Hoffmeyer, Jane
A1 Piggott, Thomas
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/01/2022.10.28.22281659.abstract
AB Background The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated novel testing strategies, including the use of Rapid Antigen Tests (RATs). The widespread distribution of RATs to the public prompted Peterborough Public Health to launch a pilot RAT self-report tool to assess its utility in COVID-19 surveillance.Objective To investigate the utility of a RAT self-report tool through an analysis of the temporal association between RAT results, PCR test results, and wastewater levels of COVID-19.Methods We investigated the association between RAT results, PCR test results, and wastewater levels of COVID-19 using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Percent positivity and count of positive tests for RATs and PCR tests were analyzed.Results PCR percent positivity and wastewater were weakly correlated (r=0.33 p=0.022), as were RAT percent positivity and wastewater (r=0.33 p=0.002). RAT percent positivity and PCR percent positivity were not significantly correlated (r=-0.035, p=0.75). Count of positive RAT tests and count of positive PCR tests were moderately correlated (r=0.59, p<0.001). Wastewater was not significantly correlated to count of positive RAT tests (r=0.019, p=0.864) or count of positive PCR tests (r=0.004, p=0.971).Conclusion Our results provide evidence in support of the use of RAT self-reporting as a low-cost simple adjunctive COVID-19 surveillance tool, and may suggest that its utility is greatest when considering an absolute count of positive RAT tests rather than percent positivity due to reporting bias towards positive tests. These results can help inform COVID-19 surveillance strategies of local Public Health Units and encourage the use of a RAT self-report tool.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Peterborough Public HealthAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon request to the authors