PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Xu, Zhimin AU - Liu, Xia AU - de Melo Ghisi, Gabriela Lima AU - Cui, Lixian AU - Grace, Sherry L TI - On the frontlines in Shanghai: Stress, burnout and perceived benefit among COVID-19 testers and other personnel during the Omicron wave lockdown AID - 10.1101/2022.10.25.22281504 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.10.25.22281504 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/27/2022.10.25.22281504.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/27/2022.10.25.22281504.full AB - Background COVID-19 control measure stringency including testing has been among the highest globally in China. Psychosocial impact on pandemic workers in Shanghai, and their pandemic-related attitudes were investigated.Methods Participants in this cross-sectional study were healthcare providers (HCP) and other support workers. A Mandarin self-report survey was administered via Wenjuanxing between April-June 2022 during the omicron-wave lockdown. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Maslach Burnout Inventory were administered, as well as pandemic-specific questions.Results 887 workers participated, of which 691 (77.9%) were HCPs. They were working a mean of 6.25±1.24 days/week for 9.77±4.28 hours/day. Most participants were burnt-out, with 143(16.1%) moderately and 98(11.0%) seriously. Total PSS was 26.85±9.92/56, with 353(39.8%) participants having elevated stress. Workers perceived their families primarily as fully supportive (n=610, 68.8%), or also extremely concerned (n=203, 22.9%). Most wanted counselling and stress relief, but half(n=430) reported no time for it; indeed, 2/3rds wanted a few days off to rest (n=601).Many workers perceived benefits: that they fostered more cohesive relationships (n=581, 65.5%), they will be more resilient (n=693, 78.1%), and were honored to serve (n=747, 84.2%).Negative impacts were greater in HCPs, those with economic insecurity, and that did not perceive benefit (all p<.05).In adjusted analyses, those perceiving benefits showed significantly less burnout (OR=0.573, 95% CI=0.411 - 0.799), among other correlates.Conclusions Pandemic work, including among non-HCP, is stressful, but some can derive benefits.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Xinhua Hospital research ethics board (XHEC-C-2022-042).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors