PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ante-Testard, Pearl Anne AU - Carrasco-Escobar, Gabriel AU - Benmarhnia, Tarik AU - Temime, Laura AU - Jean, Kévin TI - Investigating inequalities in HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from a spatial analysis of 25 countries AID - 10.1101/2022.10.20.22281320 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.10.20.22281320 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/24/2022.10.20.22281320.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/24/2022.10.20.22281320.full AB - Introduction We aim to explore spatial variations in socioeconomic inequalities in self-reported recent HIV testing uptake in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) at different geographical scales, in order to identify potential geographical hotspots of inequalities. Additionally, to evaluate the potential benefits of HIV testing programs, we assess whether local levels of HIV testing match the local levels of HIV prevalence.Methods We analyzed data from 25 countries in SSA with Demographic and Health Surveys between 2011 and 2019. We quantified socioeconomic inequalities in self-reported HIV testing in the last 12 months with both the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) in different geographical scales to capture sex-specific within-country spatial variations. We also conducted sampling cluster-level analyses based on the Local Indicator of Spatial Association to consider the autocorrelation in SII and RII across SSA countries. To assess the spatial efficiency of HIV testing programs, we measured the correlation between recent HIV testing uptake and HIV prevalence through Pearson correlation across geographical scales.Results We observed pro-rich inequalities on both absolute and relative scales in recent HIV testing in the majority of SSA countries in female and male participants at the national level. We also identified inequalities at subnational levels. Within- and between-country heterogeneities in sex-specific inequalities on both inequality scales and their respective spatial distributions varied depending on the scale used. Clustering of high absolute and relative inequalities were mostly observed in Western and Central Africa with a few regions in Eastern and Southern Africa. Despite significant sex-specific correlations between HIV testing and HIV prevalence in all countries when assessed at the national level, we report an absence of such a correlation at fine scale in 39 of 50 sex-country combinations.Conclusions These findings highlight the importance of investigating the spatial variability of various HIV indicators and related inequalities. Results may help local, national and international policymakers to prioritize areas and socioeconomic subgroups in need of HIV testing services. Our results also show the need to monitor efficiency of HIV testing programs in relation to HIV risk at subnational levels as a complementary to national estimates.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by INSERM-ANRS (France Recherche Nord and Sud Sida-HIV Hepatites), grant number ANRS-12377 B104. Disclaimer: Funding agency had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw data from the DHS surveys used in this study are publicly available for academic research. Formatted and processed data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request. https://www.dhsprogram.com/