RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Vocabulary relearning in aphasia is supported by hippocampal memory and cortical language systems
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.10.13.22280171
DO 10.1101/2022.10.13.22280171
A1 Gore, Katherine R.
A1 Woollams, Anna M.
A1 Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/17/2022.10.13.22280171.abstract
AB Speech and language therapy can be an effective tool in improving language in post-stroke aphasia. Despite an increasing literature on the efficacy of language therapies, there is a dearth of evidence about the neurocognitive mechanisms that underpin language re-learning, including the mechanisms implicated in neurotypical learning. Neurotypical word acquisition fits within the idea of Complementary Learning Systems, whereby an episodic hippocampal system supports initial rapid and sparse learning, whilst longer-term consolidation and extraction of statistical regularities across items is underpinned by neocortical systems. Therapy may drive these neurotypical learning mechanisms, and efficacy outcome may depend on whether there is available spared tissue across these dual systems to support learning.Here, for the first time, we utilised a reverse translation approach to explore these learning mechanisms in post-stroke aphasia, spanning a continuum of consolidation success. After three weeks of daily anomia treatment, 16 patients completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol; a picture naming task which probed (i) premorbid vocabulary retained despite aphasia, (ii) newly re-learned treated items and (iii) untreated/unknown and therefore unconsolidated items. The treatment was successful, significantly improving patients’ naming accuracy and reaction time post-treatment. Consistent with the Complementary Learning Systems hypothesis, patients’ overall naming of treated items, like that of controls when learning new vocabulary, was associated with increased activation of both episodic and language regions. Patients with relatively preserved left hemisphere language regions, aligned with the control data in that hippocampal activity during naming of treated items was associated with lower accuracy and slower responses – demonstrating the shifting division of labour from hippocampally-dependent new learning towards cortical support for the efficiently-named consolidated items. In contrast, patients with greater damage to the left inferior frontal gyrus displayed the opposite pattern (greater hippocampal activity when naming treated items was associated with quicker responses), implying that their therapy-driven learning was still wholly hippocampally reliant.Open access For the purpose of open access, the UKRI-funded authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a Medical Research Council National Productivity Investment Fund PhD studentship; European Research Council (GAP: 670428 - BRAIN2MIND_NEUROCOMP); Medical Research Council programme grant (MR/R023883/1) and intra-mural funding (MC_UU_00005/18).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS research ethics committee of North West Haydock Health Research Authority gave ethical approval for this work (MREC 01/8/094)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors AALAutomated Anatomical LabellingAFNIAnalysis of Functional NeuroImagesATLanterior temporal lobeBDAEBoston Diagnostic Aphasia ExaminationBOLDblood oxygen level dependentBNTBoston Naming TestCLSComplementary Learning SystemsFDRfalse discovery rateFSLFMRIB Software LibraryIFGinferior frontal gyrusIPLinferior parietal lobeLINDALesion Identification with Neighborhood Data AnalysisSLTspeech and language therapyMNIMontreal Neurological InstituteMTLmedial temporal lobepSTGposterior superior temporal gyrusRISPrepeated increasingly-speeded presentationRTreaction timeROIregion of interest.