RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of upper limb movement disorders using wearable sensors during functional tasks: a systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.10.13.22281023
DO 10.1101/2022.10.13.22281023
A1 Vanmechelen, Inti
A1 Haberfehlner, Helga
A1 De Vleeschhauwer, Joni
A1 Van Wonterghem, Ellen
A1 Feys, Hilde
A1 Desloovere, Kaat
A1 Aerts, Jean-Marie
A1 Monbaliu, Elegast
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/13/2022.10.13.22281023.abstract
AB Background Studies aiming to objectively quantify upper limb movement disorders during functional tasks using wearable sensors have recently increased, but there is a wide variety in described measurement and analyzing methods, hampering standardization of methods in research and clinics. Therefore, the primary objective of this review was to provide an overview of sensor set-up and type, included tasks, sensor features and methods used to quantify movement disorders during upper limb tasks in multiple pathological populations. The secondary objective was to select the most sensitive sensor features for symptom detection and quantification and discuss application of the proposed methods in clinical practice.Methods A literature search using Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed was performed. Articles needed to meet following criteria: (1) participants were adults/children with a neurological disease, (2) (at least) one sensor was placed on the upper limb for evaluation of movement disorders during functional tasks, (3) comparisons between: groups with/without movement disorders, sensor features before/after intervention, or sensor features with a clinical scale for assessment of the movement disorder. (4) Outcome measures included sensor features from acceleration/angular velocity signals.Results A total of 101 articles were included, of which 56 researched Parkinson’s Disease. Wrist(s), hand and index finger were the most popular sensor locations. The most frequent tasks for assessment were: finger tapping, wrist pro/supination, keeping the arms extended in front of the body and finger-to-nose. The most frequently calculated sensor features were mean, standard deviation, root-mean-square, ranges, skewness, kurtosis and entropy of acceleration and/or angular velocity, in combination with dominant frequencies and power of acceleration signals. Examples of clinical applications were automatization of a clinical scale or discrimination between a patient/control group or different patient groups.Conclusion Current overview can support clinicians and researchers to select the most sensitive pathology-dependent sensor features and measurement methodologies for detection and quantification of upper limb movement disorders and for the objective evaluations of treatment effects. The insights from Parkinson’s Disease studies can accelerate the development of wearable sensors protocols in the remaining pathologies, provided that there is sufficient attention for the standardisation of protocols, tasks, feasibility and data analysis methods.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementIV received an FWO fellowship (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen). The funder had no involvement in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors