PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Song, Jong Eun AU - Tombs, Michal TI - Teaching medical students about Kawasaki Disease: The development and evaluation of a digital educational resource AID - 10.1101/2022.10.01.22280590 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.10.01.22280590 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/04/2022.10.01.22280590.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/04/2022.10.01.22280590.full AB - Introduction The use of digital educational resources has gained widespread popularity across all disciplines in medical education; paediatrics being no exception. This paper focuses on the development and in particular, the evaluation, of an e-learning resource on Kawasaki Disease which was primarily developed as a revision aid for undergraduate medical students.Methods This digital resource was created using Xerte Online toolkit and was guided by the instructional model ADDIE. The design and development of the resource was based on Mayer’s 12 Multimedia Principles, while Zaharias and Poylymenakou’s usability evaluation method informed the preliminary evaluation.Findings Feedback from the preliminary evaluation, which was based on the instructional design parameters of ‘navigation’, ‘visual design’ and ‘intrinsic motivation to learn’, was overwhelmingly positive. However, in light of this being a small-scale evaluation conducted on just seven undergraduate students, a protocol was developed for a more in-depth and robust evaluation.Conclusions and further development The evaluation of digital educational resources remains a fundamental and essential component in creating meaningful and effective e-learning material. In line with literature on evaluation of digital educational resources in medical education, the evaluation protocol set out in this paper considers three aspects; evaluating the ability of the resource to meet its intended outcomes; evaluating the ability of the resource to meet learners’ needs; and evaluating the educational context.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used only openly available human data from survey results on Microsoft Google Forms that is included in the manuscript.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.