PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Dulyan, Lilit
AU  - Talozzi, Lia
AU  - Pacella, Valentina
AU  - Corbetta, Maurizio
AU  - Forkel, Stephanie J
AU  - Thiebaut de Schotten, Michel
TI  - Longitudinal prediction of motor dysfunction after stroke: a disconnectome study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.01.21267129
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.01.21267129
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/03/2021.12.01.21267129.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/10/03/2021.12.01.21267129.full
AB  - Motricity is the most commonly affected ability after a stroke. While many clinical studies attempt to predict motor symptoms at different chronic time points after a stroke, longitudinal acute-to-chronic studies remain scarce. Taking advantage of recent advances in mapping brain disconnections, we predict motor outcomes in 62 patients assessed longitudinally two weeks, three months, and one year after their stroke. Results indicate that brain disconnection patterns accurately predict motor impairments. However, disconnection patterns leading to impairment differ between the three time points and between left and right motor impairments. These results were cross-validated using resampling techniques. In sum, we demonstrated that while some neuroplasticity mechanisms exist changing the structure-function relationship, disconnection patterns prevail when predicting motor impairment at different time points after stroke.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 818521), the Marie Sklodowska-Curie programme (grant agreement No. 101028551), The Erasmus+ for Traineeships Programme, and the Donders Mohrmann Fellowship No. 2401515 (SJF, NEUROVARIABILITY).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of the Washington University gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe code used to analyse the data is openly available from (GitHub link)https://github.com/lidulyan/Hierarchical-Linear-Regression-R-