RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Improving hand hygiene in community settings: a scoping review of current international guidelines
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.29.22280518
DO 10.1101/2022.09.29.22280518
A1 MacLeod, Clara
A1 Braun, Laura
A1 Caruso, Bethany A.
A1 Chase, Claire
A1 Chidziwisano, Kondwani
A1 Chipungu, Jenala
A1 Dreibelbis, Robert
A1 Ejemot-Nwadiaro, Regina
A1 Gordon, Bruce
A1 Mills, Joanna Esteves
A1 Cumming, Oliver
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/29/2022.09.29.22280518.abstract
AB Background Hand hygiene is an important measure to prevent disease transmission in community settings, such as households, public spaces, workplaces, and schools. There exist various international guidelines with recommendations on how to improve hand hygiene in these settings, but no review to date has been conducted to summarise these recommendations and assess to what extent they are consistent and evidence-based.Methods To identify international guidelines with recommendations on hand hygiene in community settings, categorised as either domestic, public, and institutional, we performed electronic and grey literature searches and contacted expert organisations and individuals. Recommendations extracted from included guidelines were mapped to four areas related to hand hygiene: i) effective hand hygiene; ii) minimum requirements; iii) behaviour change; and iv) government measures. We assessed if recommendations were supported by peer-reviewed literature and checked their consistency and concordance across settings.Results We identified 51 guidelines published between 1999 and 2021 by multilateral agencies and international non-governmental organisations containing 923 recommendations. Handwashing with soap is consistently recommended as the preferred method for hand hygiene across all community settings. Most guidelines specifically recommend handwashing with plain soap and running water for at least 20 seconds; single-use paper towels for hand drying; and alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) as a complement or alternative to handwashing. There are inconsistent and discordant recommendations for water quality for handwashing, affordable and effective alternatives to soap and ABHR, and the design of handwashing stations. Further, there are gaps in recommendations on soap and water quantity, behaviour change approaches, and government measures required for effective hand hygiene. Overall, less than 10% of recommendations are supported by evidence.Conclusion While current international guidelines consistently recommend handwashing with soap in domestic, public, and institutional settings, the lack of consistent, evidence-based recommendations may constrain global efforts to ensure effective hand hygiene across community settings.What is already known on this topicHand hygiene has been found to be a cost-effective intervention that can reduce the risk of certain infectious diseases.Yet, the practice of hand hygiene, and access to the facilities which enable this, is often limited in community settings, such as households, public spaces, workplaces, and schools.There are various international guidelines with recommendations on hand hygiene in community settings, but it is unclear whether guidelines provide consistent and evidence-based recommendations.What this study addsThere are 51 guidelines with over 900 recommendations for hand hygiene in community settings published by multilateral agencies and international non-governmental organisations.Guidelines consistently recommend handwashing with soap, but there are several areas of inconsistency and discordance, as well as gaps in recommendations, related to minimum requirements, behaviour change, and government measures for effective hand hygiene in community settings.Very few recommendations are supported by peer-reviewed literature.How this study might affect research, practice, or policyThis scoping review highlights a gap in global normative guidance on hand hygiene in community settings.More research is needed to address the current areas of inconsistency and discordance, and gaps in recommendations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the World Health Organization and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development OfficeAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript