RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Differences in COVID-19 cyclicity and predictability among U.S. counties and states reflect the effectiveness of protective measures
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.28.22280465
DO 10.1101/2022.09.28.22280465
A1 Bozzuto, Claudio
A1 Ives, Anthony R.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/29/2022.09.28.22280465.abstract
AB Data available for COVID-19 in the USA make it possible to assess the dynamics of disease spread with 20:20 hindsight. Here, we analyze archived data to explain variation among counties and states in the cyclicity and predictability (that is, the extent to which predictions are possible) of disease dynamics, using a combination of statistical and simulation models. For the period after the initial outbreak but before widespread vaccination (May 2020 – February 2021), we show that for half the counties and states the spread rate of COVID-19, r(t), was predictable at most 9 weeks and 8 weeks ahead, respectively, corresponding to at most 40% and 35% of an average cycle length of 23 weeks and 26 weeks. However, there were large differences among counties and states, and high predictability was associated with high cyclicity of r(t). Furthermore, predictability was negatively associated with R0 values from the pandemic’s onset. This suggests that a severe initial outbreak induced strong and sustained protective measures to lower disease transmission, and these protective measures in turn reduced both cyclicity and predictability. Thus, decreased predictability of disease spread should be viewed as a by-product of positive and sustained steps that people take to protect themselves and others.Significance statement During the COVID-19 pandemic, many quantitative approaches were employed to predict the course of disease spread. However, forecasting faces the challenge of inherently unpredictable spread dynamics, setting a limit to the accuracy of all models. For counties and states in the USA, we document very high variation in predictability after the initial outbreak and before widespread vaccination. Jurisdictions with high predictability were those that showed pronounced cyclic re-emergences (‘waves’). The variation in predictability can be explained by differences in the human responses to disease: jurisdictions in which individuals and authorities took strong and sustained protective measures against COVID-19 successfully curbed subsequent waves of disease spread, but at the same time unintentionally decreased its predictability.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by: NASA-AIST- 80NSSC20K0282Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the present work have been previously published.