PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Seyoum, Tinsae
AU  - Tesfaye, Selamnesh
AU  - Shiferaw, Yohannes
AU  - Hailu, Rahel
AU  - Tefera, Dagim
AU  - Gebru, zeleke
TI  - Knowledge of behavioural risk factors for types 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated factors among reproductive-age women in Arba Minch town, Gamo zone, 2022
AID  - 10.1101/2022.09.23.22280282
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.09.23.22280282
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/25/2022.09.23.22280282.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/25/2022.09.23.22280282.full
AB  - Background Type 2 diabetes accounts for over 90% of all types of diabetes. It is caused by a combination of behavioral risk factors. Currently, it is a serious health problem, especially in reproductive-age women associated with reproductive disorders. To prevent it, knowledge is vital, but there is a scarcity of data on behavioral risk factors in Ethiopia.Objective To assess knowledge of the behavioral risks of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated factors among reproductive-age women in Gamo zone, Arba Minch town, 2022.Materials and Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was employed, and all women in the town were considered as the source population. A multistage sampling procedure with simple random sampling was adopted for the recruitment of kebeles. A systematic random selection procedure was also applied to the household with a 13th interval. A total of 623 samples were completed with an interview questionnaire. A bivariate logistic model was used to calculate the crude odds ratio, and multivariate analysis to control for confounding and identify the association for model fitting variables with AOR.Result The level of BRF knowledge among reproductive women is 47.0% [95% CI, 43.5-50.9], with the following factors having significant associations: average family income 3000–5000 Eth. Birr 1.81 [95% CI, 1.03-3.18], >= 5001 Eth. Birr 1.93 [95% CI, 1.02-3.68], DM in the friend or relatives 4.03[95% CI,1.56-10.46], Family history of DM 9.47 [95% CI, 4.74–18.90], source of information: health workers 1.87 [95% CI, 1.04-3.34] and friend or relatives 1.65 [95%CI,1.04-2.62].Conclusion The knowledge of behavioral risk factors for type 2 diabetes was poor among study participants. Family income, DM in the friend or relatives, family history of DM, and source of information were the associated factors with good knowledge. Health education about behavioral risk factors should be given emphasis broadly for women.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNO-Arba Minch Health Science College has given us a fund to do our research but has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or even preparing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This article is a part of our study which has been accepted by the institutional review board ethical committee for the survey of Arba Minch College of Health Sciences with the protocol code of 008/202/2021 and a certificate of approval number of Ref No/?/?/?/?/?/01/ 20/353.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.