RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Psychological safety, hierarchy, and other issues in operating room debriefing: reflexive thematic analysis of interviews from the frontline
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.23.22280268
DO 10.1101/2022.09.23.22280268
A1 McElroy, Canice
A1 Skegg, Emma
A1 Mudgway, Mercedes
A1 Murray, Ngaire
A1 Holmes, Linda
A1 Weller, Jennifer
A1 Hamill, James
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/23/2022.09.23.22280268.abstract
AB Background & purpose Debriefing facilitates team learning but currently is not consistently performed in operating rooms. Barriers exist to consistent, effective operative team debriefing. The purpose of this study was to identify these barriers and their potential solutions as articulated by front-line staff in the operating room.Methods We interviewed staff in the operating theatre of a children’s hospital and undertook reflexive thematic analysis with a critical realist theoretical framework.Results Interviews were analysed from 40 operating room staff: 14 nurses, 7 anaesthetists, 7 anaesthetic technicians, and 12 surgeons; 25 (62%) were female. The key themes were: one of the most valuable things − teamwork and audit; it’s a safe space – psychological safety is a pre-requisite of, and is enhanced by, debriefing; natural born leader − constructs around leadership; space-time – finding time to debrief, routinely and after critical events; and doing the basics well – structure without over-complication.Conclusion Psychological safety is both a prerequisite for and a product of debriefing. Leadership, if viewed as a collective responsibility, could help break down power structures. Given the results of this study and evidence in the literature, it is likely that routine debriefing, if well done, will improve psychological safety, facilitate team learning, reduce errors, and improve patient safety.Clinical relevance Debriefing in the operating room can help break down power structures, improve psychological safety, promote team learning, and lead to improved patient safety. Debriefing is challenging to perform, requires leadership, and should be seen as a collective responsibility.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Starship Foundation, Aotearoa New Zealand.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was registered with the institutional research office and received ethical approval from the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (#3228).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors