RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Mathematical modeling identifies optimal dosing schedules for COVID-19 vaccines to minimize breakthrough infections
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.14.22279959
DO 10.1101/2022.09.14.22279959
A1 Dogra, Prashant
A1 Schiavone, Carmine
A1 Wang, Zhihui
A1 Ramírez, Javier Ruiz
A1 Caserta, Sergio
A1 Staquicini, Daniela I.
A1 Markosian, Christopher
A1 Wang, Jin
A1 Sostman, H. Dirk
A1 Pasqualini, Renata
A1 Arap, Wadih
A1 Cristini, Vittorio
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/17/2022.09.14.22279959.abstract
AB While the development of different vaccines has slowed the dissemination of SARS-CoV-2, the occurrence of breakthrough infections continues to fuel the pandemic. As a strategy to secure at least partial protection, with a single dose of a given COVID-19 vaccine to maximum possible fraction of the population, delayed administration of subsequent doses (or boosters) has been implemented in many countries. However, waning immunity and emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 suggest that such measures may jeopardize the attainment of herd immunity due to intermittent lapses in protection. Optimizing vaccine dosing schedules could thus make the difference between periodic occurrence of breakthrough infections or effective control of the pandemic. To this end, we have developed a mechanistic mathematical model of adaptive immune response to vaccines and demonstrated its applicability to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as a proof-of-concept for future outbreaks. The model was thoroughly calibrated against multiple clinical datasets involving immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA vaccines in healthy and immunocompromised subjects (cancer patients undergoing therapy); the model showed robust clinical validation by accurately predicting neutralizing antibody kinetics, a correlate of vaccine-induced protection, in response to multiple doses of mRNA vaccines. Importantly, we estimated population vulnerability to breakthrough infections and predicted tailored vaccination dosing schedules to maximize protection and thus minimize breakthrough infections, based on the immune status of a sub-population. We have identified a critical waiting window for cancer patients (or, immunocompromised subjects) to allow recovery of the immune system (particularly CD4+ T-cells) for effective differentiation of B-cells to produce neutralizing antibodies and thus achieve optimal vaccine efficacy against variants of concern, especially between the first and second doses. Also, we have obtained optimized dosing schedules for subsequent doses in healthy and immunocompromised subjects, which vary from the CDC-recommended schedules, to minimize breakthrough infections. The developed modeling tool is based on generalized adaptive immune response to antigens and can thus be leveraged to guide vaccine dosing schedules during future outbreaks.Competing Interest StatementDIS, RP, and WA are listed as inventors on a patent application related to immunization strategies (International Patent Application PCT/ US2020/053758, entitled Targeted Pulmonary Delivery Compositions and Methods Using Same). CM, DIS. RP, and WA are inventors on International Patent Application PCT/US2021/040392, entitled Enhancing Immune Responses Through Targeted Antigen Expression, which describes immunization technology adapted for COVID-19. PhageNova Bio has licensed these intellectual properties and CM, DIS, RP, and WA may be entitled to standard royalties. RP, and WA are founders and equity stockholders of PhageNova Bio. RP is Chief Scientific Officer and a paid consultant of PhageNova Bio. RP and WA are founders and equity shareholders of MBrace Therapeutics; RP is a Board Member and paid consultant and WA is a Scientific Advisor at MBrace Therapeutics. These arrangements are managed in accordance with the established institutional conflict-of-interest policies of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThis study was conducted under the umbrella of the International Academic Affiliation Agreement between the Houston Methodist Academic Institute (Houston, TX, USA) and the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy). The work was supported in part by the Cockrell Foundation (PD, VC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants 1R01CA253865 (ZW, VC), 1R01CA222007 (ZW, VC), and 1R01CA226537 (ZW, VC, RP and WA), Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (NCI Cancer Center Support Grant number P30CA072720), and by awards from the Levy-Longenbaugh Donor-Advised Fund (to RP and WA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: 1) Lucas C, Wong P, Klein J, Castro TBR, Silva J, Sundaram M, et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2020;584(7821):463-9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y. 2) Collier A-rY, Yu J, McMahan K, Liu J, Chandrashekar A, Maron JS, et al. Differential Kinetics of Immune Responses Elicited by Covid-19 Vaccines. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(21):2010-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2115596. 3) Peeters M, Verbruggen L, Teuwen L, Vanhoutte G, Vande Kerckhove S, Peeters B, et al. Reduced humoral immune response after BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccination in cancer patients under antineoplastic treatment. ESMO Open. 2021;6(5):100274. Epub 2021/10/02. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100274. PubMed PMID: 34597941; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8423808. 4) Bayart J-L, Douxfils J, Gillot C, David C, Mullier F, Elsen M, et al. Waning of IgG, Total and Neutralizing Antibodies 6 Months Post-Vaccination with BNT162b2 in Healthcare Workers. Vaccines. 2021;9(10):1092. PubMed PMID: doi:10.3390/vaccines9101092. 5) Kontopoulou K, Nakas CT, Papazisis G. Significant Increase in Antibody Titers after the 3rd Booster Dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers in Greece. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 30;10(6):876. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060876. PMID: 35746484; PMCID: PMC9228774. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2588-y https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2115596 https://www.esmoopen.com/article/S2059-7029(21)00236-2/fulltext https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/10/1092 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/6/876