PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Han, Alvin X. AU - Toporowski, Amy AU - Sacks, Jilian A. AU - Perkins, Mark D. AU - Briand, Sylvie AU - van Kerkhove, Maria AU - Hannay, Emma AU - Carmona, Sergio AU - Rodriguez, Bill AU - Parker, Edyth AU - Nichols, Brooke E. AU - Russell, Colin A. TI - SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs AID - 10.1101/2022.05.20.22275319 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.05.20.22275319 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/16/2022.05.20.22275319.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/16/2022.05.20.22275319.full AB - The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify infected people. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (mean = 27 tests/100,000 people/day). We simulated COVID-19 epidemics in a prototypical LMIC to investigate how testing rates, sampling strategies, and sequencing proportions jointly impact surveillance outcomes and showed that low testing rates and spatiotemporal biases delay time-to-detection of new variants by weeks-to-months and can lead to unreliable estimates of variant prevalence even when the proportion of samples sequenced is increased. Accordingly, investments in wider access to diagnostics to support testing rates of ∼100 tests/100,000 people/day could enable more timely detection of new variants and reliable estimates of variant prevalence. The performance of global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance programs is fundamentally limited by access to diagnostic testing.Competing Interest StatementA.T., E.H., S.C., B.R. and B.E.N. declare that they are employed by FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics. J.A.S., M.D.P., S.B., M.V.K: The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the World Health Organization.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Governments of Germany, Canada, UK, Australia, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Netherlands and Portugal. A.X.H. and C.A.R. were supported by ERC NaviFlu (No. 818353). C.A.R. was also supported by NIH R01 (5R01AI132362-04) and an NWO Vici Award (09150182010027).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the Article, the Supplementary Information and the GitHub repository (https://github.com/AMC-LAEB/PATAT-sim). The PATAT model source code is also available at https://github.com/AMC-LAEB/PATAT-sim.