RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A rapid review of the effectiveness of remote consultations versus face-to-face consultations in secondary care surgical outpatient settings
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.04.22279537
DO 10.1101/2022.09.04.22279537
A1 Edwards, Deborah
A1 Csontos, Judit
A1 Gillen, Liz
A1 Carrier, Judith
A1 Lewis, Ruth
A1 Cooper, Alison
A1 Edwards, Adrian
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/06/2022.09.04.22279537.abstract
AB The use of remote consultations and telemedicine approaches significantly increased over the pandemic. There is evidence that some patients still prefer this mode of care delivery and time saving may also enable additional consultations and help to reduce waiting lists. However, the effectiveness of remote consulting for certain specialities, such as surgery, is unclear.The aim of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of video or telephone consultations, particularly focusing on clinical, patient reported and safety outcomes, in adult secondary surgical outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.14 studies were identified. These were published in 2021-2022. Evidence is low or very-low quality due to observational study designs, small sample sizes and patient selection.Policy and practice implications: Evidence is of low quality but suggests that for many surgical outpatient consultations, remote consultations are as effective as in-person consultations. There is potential for time and cost savings for remote consultations compared to in-person consultations. High quality research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of remote consultations to understand which patients and which surgical specialities would benefit most.Funding statement The Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care was funded for this work by the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health & Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care was funded for this work by the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health & Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh GovernmentAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAPPAdvanced practice professionalASAAmerican Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status ClassificationsCIConfidence intervalCTRCarpal tunnel releaseCTSCarpal tunnel syndromeCTS-6Carpal tunnel syndrome 6-item evaluation toolEDEmergency departmentGRADEGrading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and EvaluationIPIn-personIPCIn-person cohortNHSNational Health ServiceOROdd ratioPATPre-anaesthesia testingPOVPostoperative visitPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesSDStandard deviationSIGNScottish Intercollegiate Guidelines NetworkTeCTelephone cohortTMTelemedicineTMCTelemedicine cohortUKUnited KingdomUSAUnites States of AmericaWHOWorld Health Organisation