RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Cultural Evolution of Vaccine Hesitancy: Modeling the Interaction between Beliefs and Behaviors
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.26.22275604
DO 10.1101/2022.05.26.22275604
A1 Anderson, Kerri-Ann
A1 Creanza, Nicole
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/31/2022.05.26.22275604.abstract
AB Health perceptions and health-related behaviors can change at the population level as cultures evolve. In the last decade, despite the proven efficacy of vaccines, the developed world has seen a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) such as measles, pertussis, and polio. Vaccine hesitancy, an individual attitude influenced by historical, political, and socio-cultural forces, is believed to be a primary factor responsible for decreasing vaccine coverage, thereby increasing the risk and occurrence of VPD outbreaks. In recent years, mathematical models of disease dynamics have begun to incorporate aspects of human behavior, however they do not address how beliefs and motivations influence these health behaviors. Here, using a mathematical modeling framework, we explore the effects of cultural evolution on vaccine hesitancy and vaccination behavior. With this model, we shed light on facets of cultural evolution (vertical and oblique transmission, homophily, etc.) that promote the spread of vaccine hesitancy, ultimately affecting levels of vaccination coverage and VPD outbreak risk in a population. In addition, we present our model as a generalizable framework for exploring cultural evolution when humans’ beliefs influence, but do not strictly dictate, their behaviors. This model offers a means of exploring how parents’ potentially conflicting beliefs and cultural traits could affect their children’s health and fitness. We show that vaccine confidence and vaccine-conferred benefits can both be driving forces of vaccine coverage. We also demonstrate that an assortative preference among vaccine-hesitant individuals can lead to increased vaccine hesitancy and lower vaccine coverage.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Vanderbilt University and the John Templeton Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced will be made available online before publication.