RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The necessity of pyloric drainage in esophagectomies: protocol of a meta-analysis and a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.08.24.22279164
DO 10.1101/2022.08.24.22279164
A1 Csontos, Armand
A1 Németh, Dávid
A1 Szakó, Lajos
A1 Berke, Gergő
A1 Lili Sindler, Dóra
A1 Hegyi, Péter
A1 Papp, András
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/24/2022.08.24.22279164.abstract
AB Background Esophageal carcinoma is the 8th most common malignant tumour in the world with more than 600 000 cases (3.1% of all), while being the 6th most common reason of tumour mortality, causing more than 500 000 deaths (5.5% of all) annually. The 1, 3 and 5 year-prevalence are 2.4%, 1.6% and 1.3% respectively. The question of this meta-analysis is whether pyloric drainage is preferable over the lack of pyloric drainage during elective esophagectomies in patients suffering from esophageal cancer, regarding mortality, anastomosis leakage, respiratory morbidity, vomiting, gastric emptying time.Methods We plan to identify randomized controlled trials to investigate the question by performing extensive search in multiple databases. Based on of predefined criteria, two independent authors will perform the steps of selection, after which appropriate statistical analysis will be performed to identify potential significant differences. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, and GRADE approach will be used to estimate the risk of bias and quality of results.Dissemination plans We plan to distribute our results in peer-reviewed journal.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors