RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 re-reinfection and immune imprinting
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.08.23.22279026
DO 10.1101/2022.08.23.22279026
A1 Chemaitelly, Hiam
A1 Ayoub, Houssein H.
A1 Tang, Patrick
A1 Hasan, Mohammad R.
A1 Coyle, Peter
A1 Yassine, Hadi M.
A1 Al-Khatib, Hebah A.
A1 Smatti, Maria K
A1 Al-Kanaani, Zaina
A1 Al-Kuwari, Einas
A1 Jeremijenko, Andrew
A1 Kaleeckal, Anvar Hassan
A1 Latif, Ali Nizar
A1 Shaik, Riyazuddin Mohammad
A1 Abdul-Rahim, Hanan F.
A1 Nasrallah, Gheyath K.
A1 Al-Kuwari, Mohamed Ghaith
A1 Butt, Adeel A.
A1 Al-Romaihi, Hamad Eid
A1 Al-Thani, Mohamed H.
A1 Al-Khal, Abdullatif
A1 Bertollini, Roberto
A1 Abu-Raddad, Laith J.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/24/2022.08.23.22279026.abstract
AB We investigated epidemiological evidence for immune imprinting by comparing incidence of re-reinfection in the national cohort of individuals with a documented Omicron (BA.1/BA.2) reinfection after a pre-Omicron primary infection (designated as the reinfection cohort), to incidence of reinfection in the national cohort of individuals with a documented Omicron (BA.1/BA.2) primary infection (designated as the primary-infection cohort). This was done using a matched, retrospective cohort study that emulated a randomized “target trial”. Vaccinated individuals were excluded. Associations were estimated using Cox proportional-hazard regression models. Cumulative incidence of infection was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8-1.4%) for the reinfection cohort and 2.1% (95% CI: 1.8-2.3%) for the primary-infection cohort, 135 days after the start of follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for infection was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.40-0.68), comparing incidence in the reinfection cohort to that in the primary-infection cohort. The aHR was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.40-0.85) in a subgroup analysis in which primary infection in the reinfection cohort was restricted to only the index virus or Alpha variant. In the first 70 days of follow-up, when incidence was dominated by BA.2, the aHR was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.51-1.65). However, cumulative incidence curves diverged when BA.4/BA.5 subvariants dominated incidence (aHR, 0.46 (95% CI: 0.34-0.62)). There was no evidence that immune imprinting compromises protection against Omicron subvariants. However, there was evidence that having two infections, one with a pre-Omicron variant followed by one with an Omicron subvariant, elicits stronger protection against future Omicron-subvariant reinfection than having had only one infection with an Omicron subvariant.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors are grateful for support from the Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, both at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, as well as for support provided by the Ministry of Public Health, Hamad Medical Corporation, and Sidra Medicine. The authors are also grateful for the Qatar Genome Programme and Qatar University Biomedical Research Center for institutional support for the reagents needed for the viral genome sequencing. Statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Hamad Medical Corporation and Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Institutional Review Boards approved this retrospective study with a waiver of informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset of this study is a property of the Qatar Ministry of Public Health that was provided to the researchers through a restricted-access agreement that prevents sharing the dataset with a third party or publicly. Future access to this dataset can be considered through a direct application for data access to Her Excellency the Minister of Public Health (https://www.moph.gov.qa/english/Pages/default.aspx). Aggregate data are available within the manuscript.