RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Entrusting “Attitudes” in the K/S/A of Bedside Cardiac Assessment
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.08.23.22279141
DO 10.1101/2022.08.23.22279141
A1 Meisel, James L.
A1 Navedo, Deborah
A1 Opole, Isaac O.
A1 Chen, Daniel C. R.
A1 Cohen, Gail March
A1 Bernard, Sheilah A.
A1 Carmona, Hugo
A1 Petrusa, Emil R.
A1 Nahas, Ahmed H.
A1 Eiduson, Carly M.
A1 Papps, Nick
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/24/2022.08.23.22279141.abstract
AB Problem In the competency-based medical education literature, investigators have typically discussed notions of trust in the context of entrustment decision-making rather than as attitudes within competency frameworks. Complementarity between concepts of entrustable professional activities and of competencies created an opportunity to infuse the latter with notions of trust.Bedside cardiac assessment (BCA) exemplified one such competency. Traditional approaches to teaching and learning BCA addressed relevant knowledge and skills but not attitudes. We conceptualized entrustability as part of an attitudinal approach to teaching and learning BCA more holistically and effectively. The purpose of this thematic analysis was to explore students’ experience, in a medicine clerkship at one U.S. medical school, of participating in a newly developed BCA curriculum that aimed to foster attitudinal growth and a holistic approach to clinical learning.Approach Building upon Teaching for Understanding and conceptual change frameworks, the authors developed a flipped class curriculum utilizing pre-class short online videos and practice exercises followed by in-class activities and reflective discussions. Using a combination of content analysis and thematic analysis methodology of open-ended questionnaires administered from November 2017 to June 2018, the authors analyzed the experiences of medical students at one of the schools at which the curriculum was implemented.Outcomes Thematic analysis suggested learning strategies were effective and that peer encounters, skills practice, and encounters with educators were meaningful. The analysis also revealed opportunities to improve the original instructional design.Next Steps The authors will incorporate feedback into future iterations of the curriculum and make it widely available to better study its impact on learners’ abilities; entrustability as a construct; and transfer of learning from the classroom to the workplace. Further work is needed to clarify the value of incorporating notions of trust into competency frameworks. The authors intend this exploratory work to stimulate conversations around expanded roles of trustworthiness and entrustability in medical education.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAn Education Pilot grant from the BUMC Faculty Development Committee funded part of this study. Our work was also partially supported with resources from VA Bedford, VA Boston, and the New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Boston University Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed the research and made the determination that it was not human subjects research and therefore had no requirement to obtain consent, IRB Number: H-42353, Jan. 10, 2022. This work was reviewed by the VA Bedford Healthcare System IRB and determined not to require its oversight.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.