PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Westerhof, Ilse AU - de Hoog, Marieke L. A. AU - Ieven, Greet AU - Lammens, Christine AU - van Beek, Janko AU - Rozhnova, Ganna AU - Eggink, Dirk AU - Euser, Sjoerd M AU - Wildenbeest, Joanne G AU - Duijts, Liesbeth AU - van Houten, Marlies A. AU - Goossens, Herman AU - Giaquinto, Carlo AU - Bruijning-Verhagen, Patricia C. J. L. TI - Symptom presentation among SARS-CoV-2 positive cases and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination; three prospective household cohorts AID - 10.1101/2022.08.19.22278985 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.08.19.22278985 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/22/2022.08.19.22278985.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/22/2022.08.19.22278985.full AB - BACKGROUND The symptom burden of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 in the community and across paediatric and adult age-groups compared to earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2, and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the symptom burden is unclear. We aimed to systematically compare the symptom burden of the wild-type and Alpha variant infected individuals versus the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 infected individuals, using European prospective household studies.METHODS We combined data from three European prospective household studies conducted during the wild-type and Alpha period (April 2020 to April 2021) and the early Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 dominant period (January to March 2022). All three household transmission studies used similar protocols. Households were prospectively followed from detection of the first SARS-CoV-2 index case until at least day 21 including (repeated) PCR testing, paired serology and daily symptom reporting for all household members. To avoid possible index-case ascertainment bias, we restricted analyses to secondary household cases. Age-stratified SARS-CoV-2 symptom burden was compared for wild-type/Alpha versus Omicron infections and for primary versus primary plus booster series vaccinated adult cases.FINDINGS In total 216 secondary cases from wild-type/Alpha, and 130 from the Omicron period were included. Unvaccinated children <12 years experienced more symptoms and higher maximum and cumulative severity scores during the Omicron compared to the wild-type/Alpha period (p=0.004, p=0.011 and p=0.075, respectively). In adults, disease duration and maximum and cumulative severity scores were reduced during the Omicron period. Overall, the odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age, gender and prior immunity, showed lower odds of loss of smell or taste during the Omicron period (OR:0.14; 95%CI 0.03-0.50), whereas sore throat (OR:2.23; 95%CI 1.03-4.81), fatigue (OR:2.00; 95%CI 0.98-4.14) and coughing (OR:1.85; 95%CI 0.92-3.78) were more frequent. Comparing primary versus primary plus booster vaccinated adult cases during the Omicron period no differences were observed in disease severity or duration (p≥0.12).INTERPRETATION Upper respiratory tract symptoms are more common in SARS-CoV-2 infections during the Omicron period compared to wild-type/Alpha period, but loss of smell or taste is less frequent. In children, the Omicron variant causes higher symptom burden compared to the wild-type/Alpha. Adults experienced a lower symptom burden possibly due to prior vaccination. However, no significant differences in symptom severity between primary versus primary plus booster series vaccinated adults were observed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work forms part of RECOVER (Rapid European COVID-19 Emergency Response research) and VERDI (SARS-coV2 variants Evaluation in pRegnancy and paeDIatrics cohorts). RECOVER (101003589) is funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. VERDI project (101045989) is funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s)only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. In addition, part of the work is funded by ZonMw.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committees of Medical Ethical Committee Utrecht, Medical Ethical Committee of the Vrije Universiteit university Medical Centre, and the Medical Ethical Committee of Erasmus Medical Centre, gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.