PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Shurko, James F. AU - Mares, Chris A. AU - Page, Robert B. AU - Lopez, Kristina AU - Nguyen, Vivian AU - Vanee, Niti AU - Mishra, Pramod K. TI - Prevalence and Characterization of Bacteria Present in the Nasopharynx of Outpatients with and without SARS-CoV-2 AID - 10.1101/2022.08.17.22278915 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.08.17.22278915 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/18/2022.08.17.22278915.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/18/2022.08.17.22278915.full AB - COVID-19 has emerged as a highly contagious and debilitating disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and has claimed the lives of over 6.8 million people worldwide. Bacterial co-infections are one of many co-morbidities that have been suggested to impact the outcome of COVID-19 in patients. The primary goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of bacterial co-infections and to describe any trends observed during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. To do this, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial co-infections from outpatient RT-PCR testing in Texas. The results indicate Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae were the most frequently detected bacterial pathogens in both SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients and that these bacterial pathogens were present in these two patient populations at similar proportions. We also detected Staphylococcus aureus in a significantly larger proportion of males relative to females and people under 65 years of age relative to those 65 and over. Finally, we found that Hispanics were 75% more likely to be SARS-CoV-2 positive than non-Hispanics. The results suggest that COVID-19 patients may benefit from rapid diagnostic tests for bacterial pathogens and that this information could help delineate targeted antimicrobial therapy.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of Texas A&M University-San Antonio gave ethical approval of this work and determined the study to be exempt from IRB review (Exception #4).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.