PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Elton, David
AU  - Zhang, Meng
AU  - Okaya, Amy
TI  - Geographic variation in the treatment of spinal disorders: association with health care professional availability, and population socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. A retrospective cohort study
AID  - 10.1101/2022.08.15.22278722
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.08.15.22278722
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/17/2022.08.15.22278722.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/17/2022.08.15.22278722.full
AB  - Importance Spinal disorders are common and associated with high rates of low value care. Efforts to improve guideline concordance and value benefit from understanding the influence of population and environmental factors.Objective Quantify geographic variation in population race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and health care professional (HCP) availability, and associated variation in service utilization and total cost for management of spinal disorders.Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study examines a national sample of 1,534,280 complete episodes of a spinal disorder experienced in 2017-2019 using zip code and episode of care. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and ridge regression were used to examine associations between independent and dependent measures.Exposures Zip code level measures of population race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status were the primary independent measures.Main Outcomes and Measures Availability of and access to 17 types of HCPs, use of 14 types of health care services, and total cost were the primary dependent measures.Results 1,075,204 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older from 29,318 zip codes were associated with 1,534,280 episodes of a spinal disorder involving 531,115 HCPs generating $2,022,124,695 in expenditures. Compared to those in primarily white, middle income zip codes, individuals in non-white, disadvantaged zip codes were more likely to initially contact an emergency medicine physician (RR 2.23, 95% CI 2.11-2.36) or primary care provider (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.38-1.42) and less likely to contact a chiropractor (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.34-0.37). These individuals had higher exposure to prescription NSAIDs (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.95-2.02), skeletal muscle relaxants (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.52-1.59), opioids (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15-1.20), and CT scans (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.84-2.04).Conclusions and Relevance Individuals in affluent, primarily non-Hispanic white zip codes have an abundance of options for managing a spinal disorder. Use of first line non-pharmacological and non-interventional options should be reinforced before second- and third-line services are considered. Individuals in low-income, non-white zip codes have less availability of non-pharmacological options, leading to greater use of emergency department and primary care and resulting in pharmaceutical management of spinal disorders. Sustainable models that increase availability of non-pharmaceutical options warrant further study.Question Compared to the middle-income zip codes with a primarily non-Hispanic white population, do individuals with a spinal disorder living in zip codes characterized by socioeconomic disadvantage and a primarily non-white population have different care experiences?Findings Individuals with low back pain living in non-white, low-income zip codes have less availability of chiropractors, physical therapists and licensed acupuncturists and are more likely to seek initial treatment from an emergency department or primary care provider. These same individuals are more likely to receive pharmaceutical management, including prescription opioids, and less likely to receive guideline recommended non-pharmaceutical and non-interventional first line treatments.Meaning These findings suggest the need to create economically sustainable models that ensure access to guideline concordant non-pharmaceutical treatment options in non-white, low-income communities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Because data was linked from various sources, a review was performed to assess compliance with de-identification requirements. With data being de-identified or a Limited Data Set in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research Affairs determined that Institutional Review Board approval or waiver of authorization was not required.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptLBPLow back painPCPPrimary care providerCPGClinical practice guidelineHCPHealth care professionalSESSocioeconomic statusUSUnited StatesAGIAdjusted gross incomeADIArea Deprivation IndexHLHealth literacySTROBEStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyETG®Episode Treatment Group®ERG®Episode Risk Group®FIPSFederal Information Processing StandardZCTAzip Code Tabulation AreaACPAmerican College of PhysiciansNHWNon-Hispanic WhiteNHBNon-Hispanic BlackNHANon-Hispanic AsianDODoctor of OsteopathyOBGYNObstetrics and GynecologyNMSNeuromusculoskeletalSDStandard deviationOROdds ratioRRRisk ratioCIConfidence intervalDCDoctor of ChiropracticPTPhysical TherapistEMEmergency MedicineLAcLicensed AcupuncturistPAPhysician’s AssistantMRIMagnetic resonance imagingCTcomputed tomographyNSAIDNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugCMTChiropractic manipulative treatmentOMTOsteopathic manipulative treatment