PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rast, Fabian Marcel AU - Jucker, Florence AU - Labruyère, Rob TI - Accuracy of sensor-based classification of clinically relevant motor activities in daily life of children with mobility impairments AID - 10.1101/2022.08.01.22278307 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.08.01.22278307 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/03/2022.08.01.22278307.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/03/2022.08.01.22278307.full AB - Background Wearable inertial sensors enable objective, long-term monitoring of motor activities in the children’s habitual environment after rehabilitation. However, sophisticated algorithms are needed to derive clinically relevant outcome measures. Therefore, we developed three independent algorithms based on the needs of pediatric rehabilitation. The first algorithm estimates the duration of lying, sitting, and standing positions and the number of sit-to-stand transitions with data of a trunk and a thigh sensor. The second algorithm detects active wheeling periods and distinguishes it from passive wheeling with data of a wrist and a wheelchair sensor. The third algorithm detects walking periods, discriminates between free and assisted walking, and estimates the covered altitude change during stair climbing with data of a single ankle sensor and a sensor placed on walking aids.Research question This study aimed to determine the accuracy of each algorithm in children undergoing rehabilitation.Methods Thirty-one children and adolescents with various medical diagnoses and levels of mobility impairments performed a semi-structured activity circuit. They wore inertial sensors on both wrists, the sternum, and the thigh and shank of the less-affected side. Video recordings, which were labeled by two independent researchers, served as reference criteria to determine the algorithms’ performance.Results The activity classification accuracy was 97% for the posture detection algorithm, 96% for the wheeling detection algorithm, and 93% for the walking detection algorithm.Significance This study presents three novel algorithms that provide a comprehensive and clinically relevant view of the children’s motor activities. These algorithms are described reproducibly and can be applied to other inertial sensor technologies. Moreover, they were validated in children with mobility impairments and can be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to determine the children’s motor performance in their habitual environment. To enable the evaluation of future algorithms, we published the labeled dataset.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Walter Muggli Fund of the ACCENTUS Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland, the Children's Research Center of the University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland, and the Anna Mueller Grocholski Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland. The funding sources were not involved in designing the study; in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data; and in writing the report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of the Canton Zurich, Switzerland (Kantonale Ethikkommission Zuerich) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.