PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio
AU  - Rezapour, Tara
AU  - Giddens, Emily
AU  - Zonoozi, Arash Khojasteh
AU  - Rafei, Parnian
AU  - Berry, Jamie
AU  - Caracuel, Alfonso
AU  - Copersino, Marc L.
AU  - Field, Matt
AU  - Garland, Eric L.
AU  - Lorenzetti, Valentina
AU  - Malloy-Diniz, Leandro
AU  - Manning, Victoria
AU  - Marceau, Ely M.
AU  - Pennington, David L.
AU  - Strickland, Justin
AU  - Wiers, Reinout
AU  - Fairhead, Rahia
AU  - Anderson, Alexandra
AU  - Bell, Morris
AU  - Boendermaker, Wouter J.
AU  - Brooks, Samantha
AU  - Bruno, Raimondo
AU  - Campanella, Salvatore
AU  - Cousijn, Janna
AU  - Cox, Miles
AU  - Dean, Andrew C.
AU  - Ersche, Karen D
AU  - Franken, Ingmar
AU  - Froeliger, Brett
AU  - Gamito, Pedro
AU  - Gladwin, Thomas E.
AU  - Goncalves, Priscila D.
AU  - Houben, Katrijn
AU  - Jacobus, Joanna
AU  - Jones, Andrew
AU  - Kaag, Anne M.
AU  - Lindenmeyer, Johannes
AU  - McGrath, Elly
AU  - Nardo, Talia
AU  - Oliveira, Jorge
AU  - Pennington, Charlotte R.
AU  - Perrykkad, Kelsey
AU  - Piercy, Hugh
AU  - Rupp, Claudia I
AU  - Schulte, Mieke H. J.
AU  - Squeglia, Lindsay M.
AU  - Staiger, Petra
AU  - Stein, Dan J
AU  - Stein, Jeff
AU  - Stein, Maria
AU  - Stoops, William W.
AU  - Sweeney, Mary
AU  - Vo, Hoa
AU  - Witkiewitz, Katie
AU  - Woods, Steven P
AU  - Yi, Richard
AU  - Zhao, Min
AU  - Ekhtiari, Hamed
TI  - Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: A Delphi consensus study
AID  - 10.1101/2022.07.28.22278144
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.07.28.22278144
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/31/2022.07.28.22278144.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/31/2022.07.28.22278144.full
AB  - Background and Aims Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with cognitive deficits that are not always addressed in current treatments, and this hampers recovery. Cognitive training and remediation interventions are well suited to fill the gap for managing cognitive deficits in SUD. We aimed to reach consensus on recommendations for developing and applying these interventions.Design Delphi approach with two sequential phases: survey development and iterative surveying of experts.Setting Online study.Participants During survey development, we engaged a group of 15 experts from a working group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (Steering Committee). During the surveying process, we engaged a larger pool of experts (n=53) identified via recommendations from the Steering Committee and a systematic review.Measurements Survey with 67 items covering four key areas of intervention development, i.e., targets, intervention approaches, active ingredients, and modes of delivery.Findings Across two iterative rounds (98% retention rate), the experts reached a consensus on 50 items including: (i) implicit biases, positive affect, arousal, executive functions, and social processing as key targets of interventions; (ii) cognitive bias modification, contingency management, emotion regulation training, and cognitive remediation as preferred approaches; (iii) practice, feedback, difficulty-titration, bias-modification, goal setting, strategy learning, and meta-awareness as active ingredients; and (iv) both addiction treatment workforce and specialized neuropsychologists facilitating delivery, together with novel digital-based delivery modalities.Conclusions Expert recommendations on cognitive training and remediation for SUD highlight the relevance of targeting implicit biases, reward, emotion regulation, and higher-order cognitive skills via well-validated intervention approaches qualified with mechanistic techniques and flexible delivery options.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Australian Medical Research Future Fund (MRF1141214).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study (Reference: MUHREC #27242), and all participants provided informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe study protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework platform (https://osf.io/xwpes/) on 25/08/2021, prior to commencement of data collection. https://osf.io/xwpes/