RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of experiences and attitudes of patients towards patient portal enabled access to their health information or medical records – A Qualitative Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.23.22277951
DO 10.1101/2022.07.23.22277951
A1 Kuppanda, Preksha Machaiya
A1 Jenkins, Judy
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/29/2022.07.23.22277951.abstract
AB The demand for patient centred care and patient engagement in their healthcare has driven patient portal introduction. The widespread adoption and use of patient portals, however, has been a rather slow process in the United Kingdom (UK). Hence, a limited number of studies have explored patient perceptions and experiences of general portal use which forms a foundation for successful implementation of a portal. This study, therefore, focuses on the experiences and attitudes of patients regarding use of patient portals and access to their health information. It further explores various factors perceived by patients that may influence portal use and uptake. These patient experiences were gathered through semi-structured interviews of 13 participants and the data collected was subjected to analysis using the grounded theory approach. The overall findings from this study highlights positive patient perceptions of portal use. Nevertheless, it demonstrates various areas of improvement essential to ensure successful implementation and acceptance of patient portals in the future.Authors summary Patient portals have become a globally popular tool used in the healthcare sector due to its potential to increase patient engagement which is considered essential to provide patient centred care. Similarly, the use of patient portals in the UK has increased, with different providers making this service available to patients. Patients are the key target users of patient portals, however, there is limited research that focuses on understanding patients’ perspective of using a patient portal and accessing their health information. The majority of the existing studies have either evaluated providers or healthcare professionals’ perspective of patient portal implementation or explored patient experiences of using patient portal tailored to cater individuals with specific health conditions. Therefore, our aim was to explore patients’ perception of patient portals and their experiences of accessing their health information or medical records through one. Our research has captured various factors that has influenced portal use among patients and the impact of health information access on patients and their care process. Additionally, it has identified scope for future development and discussed factors that could potentially improve patient portal implementation and drive portal use and uptake among patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Swansea University Medical School Research Ethics and Governance Committee (SUMS RESC project ref number 2021-0065).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe data associated with this study included original participant interview recordings and transcripts. As per the ethical approval from Swansea University Medical School Research Ethics and Governance Committee, the interview recordings were deleted post publication of my Master's results. The interview transcripts retention is approved for a further period of 2 years (up to May 2024), therefore, these transcripts cannot be made publicly available. For more information on data availability please contact me at: prekshamachaiya@gmail.com