RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Antibody Persistence and Safety through 6 Months after Heterologous Orally Aerosolised Ad5-nCoV in individuals primed with two-dose CoronaVac previously
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.26.22278072
DO 10.1101/2022.07.26.22278072
A1 Jin, Lairun
A1 Tang, Rong
A1 Wu, Shipo
A1 Guo, Xiling
A1 Hou, Lihua
A1 Chen, Xiaoqin
A1 Zhu, Tao
A1 Gou, Jinbo
A1 Huang, Haitao
A1 Zhong, Jin
A1 Pan, Hongxing
A1 Cui, Lunbiao
A1 chen, Yin
A1 Xia, Xin
A1 Feng, Jialu
A1 Wang, Xue
A1 Zhao, Qi
A1 Xu, XiaoYu
A1 Li, Zhuopei
A1 Zhang, Xiaoyin
A1 Li, Jingxin
A1 Chen, Wei
A1 Zhu, Fengcai
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/28/2022.07.26.22278072.abstract
AB Background Heterologous orally administered adenovirus type-5 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine (Ad5-nCoV) in individuals who were primed with two-dose CoronaVac (an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, by Sinovac) previously, has been reported to be safe and highly immunogenic within 28 days post-boosting. However, antibody persistence and safety up to 6 months of this regimen are not been reported yet.Methods This is a randomized, open label, single-center trial on safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunization with an orally administered aerosolised Ad5-nCoV vs. homologous boost immunization with CoronaVac after two-dose priming with CoronaVac in Chinese adults aged 18 years and older (NCT05043259). We followed the participants in this trial, including 140 in the low-dose aerosolised Ad5-nCoV group, 139 in the high-dose aerosolised Ad5-nCoV group, and 140 in the CoronaVac group for 6 months. Neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus and omicron variant, and receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG antibodies were detected in serum samples collected at 28 days, 3 months, and 6 months after the booster dose. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were documented till month 6.Results The low-dose and high-dose heterologous boost immunisation groups had NAb GMTs against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 of 1937.3 [95% CI 1466.9, 2558.4] and 1350.8 [95% CI 952.6, 1915.3], which were 26.4 folds and 18.4 folds higher than that the CoronaVac group did (73.5 [95% CI 52.3, 103.3]) at 28 days. The low-dose and high-dose heterologous boost immunisation groups had NAb GMTs against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 of 530.1 (95% CI 412.5, 681.1) and 457.6 (95%CI 349.4, 599.2), which were 26.0 folds and 22.4 folds higher than that the CoronaVac group did (20.4 [95%CI 14.3, 29.1]) at 3 months, respectively. At 6 months, the low-dose and high-dose heterologous booster groups had NAb GMTs against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 of 312.9 (95% CI 237.7, 411.8) and 251.1 (95% CI 178.2, 354.0), which were 30.1 folds and 24.1 folds higher than the CoronaVac group did (10.4 [95% CI 7.8, 14.0]), respectively. Additionally, the low-dose and high-dose heterologous booster groups had NAb GMTs against live omicron variant of 52.0 (95% CI 37.2, 72.6) and 23.1 (95% CI 15.7, 33.9) at 28 days, 27.9 (95% CI 18.8, 41.3) and 23.3 (95% CI 16.2, 33.3) at 3 months, 16.0 (95% CI 10.9, 23.5) and 12.0 (95% CI 8.5, 16.8) at 6 months, respectively. However, nearly all participants had no detectable NAbs for omicron variant in the CoronaVac group at either 28 days, 3 months, or 6 months. No vaccine-related SAEs were observed.Conclusions These data suggested that heterologous aerosolised Ad5-nCoV following two-dose CoronaVac priming was safe and persistently more immunogenic than three-dose CoronaVac, although immune responses waned over time.Competing Interest StatementT.Z., J.G., H.H., X.W., and Q.Z. are employees of CanSino Biologics. All other authors declare no competing interests.Clinical TrialNCT05043259Funding StatementThis work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82173584), Jiangsu Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (grant number: BK20220064) and Jiangsu Provincial key project of science and technology plan (grant number: BE2021738).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The trial protocol was approved by Research Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines and local guidelines.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe results supporting the findings in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors.