RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection among children and adolescents in Qatar
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.26.22278045
DO 10.1101/2022.07.26.22278045
A1 Chemaitelly, Hiam
A1 AlMukdad, Sawsan
A1 Ayoub, Houssein H.
A1 Altarawneh, Heba N.
A1 Coyle, Peter
A1 Tang, Patrick
A1 Yassine, Hadi M.
A1 Al-Khatib, Hebah A.
A1 Smatti, Maria K.
A1 Hasan, Mohammad R.
A1 Al-Kanaani, Zaina
A1 Al-Kuwari, Einas
A1 Jeremijenko, Andrew
A1 Kaleeckal, Anvar Hassan
A1 Latif, Ali Nizar
A1 Shaik, Riyazuddin Mohammad
A1 Abdul-Rahim, Hanan F.
A1 Nasrallah, Gheyath K.
A1 Al-Kuwari, Mohamed Ghaith
A1 Al-Romaihi, Hamad Eid
A1 Butt, Adeel A.
A1 Al-Thani, Mohamed H.
A1 Al-Khal, Abdullatif
A1 Bertollini, Roberto
A1 Abu-Raddad, Laith J.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/26/2022.07.26.22278045.abstract
AB Background The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine is authorized for children 5-11 years of age and adolescents 12-17 years of age, but in different dose sizes. We assessed BNT162b2 real-world effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection among children and adolescents in Qatar.Methods Three matched, retrospective, target-trial, cohort studies were conducted to compare incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the national cohort of vaccinated individuals to incidence in the national cohort of unvaccinated individuals. Associations were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards regression models.Results Effectiveness of the 10 µg dose for children against Omicron infection was 25.7% (95% CI: 10.0-38.6%). It was highest at 49.6% (95% CI: 28.5-64.5%) right after the second dose, but waned rapidly thereafter and was negligible after 3 months. Effectiveness was 46.3% (95% CI: 21.5-63.3%) among those aged 5-7 years and 16.6% (−4.2-33.2%) among those aged 8-11 years. Effectiveness of the 30 µg dose for adolescents against Omicron infection was 30.6% (95% CI: 26.9-34.1%), but many adolescents were vaccinated months earlier. Effectiveness waned with time after the second dose. Effectiveness was 35.6% (95% CI: 31.2-39.6%) among those aged 12-14 years and 20.9% (13.8-27.4%) among those aged 15-17 years. Effectiveness of the 30 µg dose for adolescents against pre-Omicron infection was 87.6% (95% CI: 84.0-90.4%) and waned relatively slowly after the second dose.Conclusions Pediatric vaccination is associated with modest and rapidly waning protection against Omicron infection. Adolescent vaccination is associated with stronger and more durable protection, perhaps because of the larger dose size. Age at such young age appears to play a role in determining vaccine protection, with greater protection observed in younger than older children or adolescents.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors are grateful for institutional salary support from the Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, both at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, as well as for institutional salary support provided by the Ministry of Public Health, Hamad Medical Corporation, and Sidra Medicine. The authors are also grateful for the Qatar Genome Programme and Qatar University Biomedical Research Center for institutional support for the reagents needed for the viral genome sequencing. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the article. Statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Hamad Medical Corporation and Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Institutional Review Boards approved this retrospective study with waiver of informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset of this study is a property of the Qatar Ministry of Public Health that was provided to the researchers through a restricted-access agreement that prevents sharing the dataset with a third party or publicly. Future access to this dataset can be considered through a direct application for data access to Her Excellency the Minister of Public Health (https://www.moph.gov.qa/english/Pages/default.aspx). Aggregate data are available within the manuscript and its Supplementary information.