PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Selvavinayagam, T.S.
AU  - Somasundaram, A.
AU  - Selvam, Jerard Maria
AU  - Ramachandran, Sabareesh
AU  - Sampath, P.
AU  - Vijayalakshmi, V.
AU  - Ajith Brabhu Kumar, C.
AU  - Subramaniam, Sudharshini
AU  - Parthipan, K.
AU  - Raju, S.
AU  - Avudaiselvi, R.
AU  - Prakash, V.
AU  - Yogananth, N.
AU  - Subramanian, Gurunathan
AU  - Roshini, A.
AU  - Dhiliban, D.N.
AU  - Imad, Sofia
AU  - Tandel, Vaidehi
AU  - Parasa, Rajeswari
AU  - Sachdeva, Stuti
AU  - Malani, Anup
TI  - Contribution of infection and vaccination to seroprevalence through two COVID waves in Tamil Nadu, India
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.14.21265758
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.14.21265758
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/25/2021.11.14.21265758.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/25/2021.11.14.21265758.full
AB  - Four rounds of serological surveys were conducted, spanning two COVID waves (October 2020 and April-May 2021), in Tamil Nadu (population 72 million) state in India. Each round included representative populations in each district of the state, totaling ≥20,000 persons per round. State-level seroprevalence was 31.5% in round 1 (October-November 2020), after India’s first COVID wave. Seroprevalence fell to 22.9% in 2 (April 2021), consistent with waning of antibodies from natural infection. Seroprevalence rose to 67.1% by round 3 (June-July 2021), reflecting infections from the Delta-variant induced second COVID wave. Seroprevalence rose to 93.1% by round 4 (December 2021-January 2022), reflecting higher vaccination rates. Antibodies also appear to wane after vaccination. Seroprevalence in urban areas was higher than in rural areas, but the gap shrunk over time (35.7 v. 25.7% in round 1, 89.8% v. 91.4% in round 4) as the epidemic spread even in low-density rural areas.Article Summary Line Antibodies waned after India’s first COVID wave and both vaccination and infection contributed its roughly 90% seroprevalence after its second wave.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Government of Tamil Nadu.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Directorate of Public Health & Preventative Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, and the Institutional Ethics Committee of Madras Medical College, Chennai, India, gave ethical approval of this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThese data are not publically available. However, researchers may approach the Government of Tamil Nadu to request access. The decision to grant access will be made by the government.