RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The burden of human coronavirus infection in children hospitalised with lower respiratory tract infection in Cape Town, South Africa
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.24.22277967
DO 10.1101/2022.07.24.22277967
A1 Aliyu, Abdulmumuni S.
A1 Masu, Adelaide N.
A1 Kagina, Benjamin M.
A1 Muloiwa, Rudzani
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/25/2022.07.24.22277967.abstract
AB Introduction Human coronaviruses (HCoV) NL63, HKU, OC43 and 229E are known to cause various respiratory infections including croup, pneumonia, and bronchitis in young children. The role of these four HCoV strains in the aetiology of pneumonia is little described in South Africa.Methods We used data collected between September 2012 – September 2013 from children aged <13 years with lower respiratory illness at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital. Respiratory samples including a nasopharyngeal swab (NP) and induced sputum (IS) were taken and tested for the four strains of coronaviruses using FTD33 multiplex real-time PCR.Results A total of 460 respiratory samples were analysed. Of these, 258 (56.0%) were male and 19 (4.1%) HIV infected. The median age of the children was 8 (IQR 4-18) months.Nasopharyngeal (NP) samples were obtained from 460 children while induced sputum (IS) was not available for six children due to sample loss prior to analysis, leaving 454 available for analysis. A total of 42 (9.1%, 95% CI 6.7-12.1%) participants tested positive for HCoV in at least one of the two specimens. PCR was able to detect a total of 35 (7.7%) cases from the 454 tested IS specimens compared to 23 (5.0%) detected out of 460 NP samples.The commonest detected HCoVs were coronavirus OC43 with 20 (4.3%) detected from either specimen followed by coronavirus NL63 or coronavirus HKU detected in 14 (3.0%) and 10 (2.2%) of positive test samples, respectively. The least common virus detected HCoV was coronavirus 229E detected in both positive test samples of one participant.Overall HCoVs were detected in 23 (8.9%) of boys compared to 19 (9.1%) of the girls who returned a positive test; p=0.856. The overall age distribution of children with PCR detected HCoVs was similar to that of children with a negative result with median age of 10 (IQR 5-16) months and median of 8 (IQR 4-19) months, respectively; p=0.535. Prevalence of HCoV was 11/192 (5.7%), 23/153 (15.0%) and 8/115 (7.0%) in children <6 months old, 6-18 months and over 18 months respectively; p=0.008.Conclusion Children aged 6 to 18 months had double the risk of other age groups.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Cape Town gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript