PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Parag, Kris V
AU  - Donnelly, Christl A
AU  - Zarebski, Alexander E
TI  - Quantifying the information in noisy epidemic curves
AID  - 10.1101/2022.05.16.22275147
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.05.16.22275147
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/12/2022.05.16.22275147.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/12/2022.05.16.22275147.full
AB  - Reliably estimating the dynamics of transmissible diseases from noisy surveillance data is an enduring problem in modern epidemiology. Key parameters, such as the instantaneous reproduction number, Rt at time t, are often inferred from incident time series, with the aim of informing policymakers on the growth rate of outbreaks or testing hypotheses about the effectiveness of public health interventions. However, the reliability of these inferences depends critically on reporting errors and latencies innate to those time series. While studies have proposed corrections for these issues, methodology for formally assessing how these sources of noise degrade Rt estimate quality is lacking. By adapting Fisher information and experimental design theory, we develop an analytical framework to quantify the uncertainty induced by under-reporting and delays in reporting infections. This yields a novel metric, defined by the geometric means of reporting and cumulative delay probabilities, for ranking surveillance data informativeness. We apply this metric to two primary data sources for inferring Rt: epidemic case and death curves. We find that the assumption of death curves as more reliable, commonly made for acute infectious diseases such as COVID-19 and influenza, is not obvious and possibly untrue in many settings. Our framework clarifies and quantifies how actionable information about pathogen transmissibility is lost due to surveillance limitations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementKVP acknowledges support from the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at University of Bristol. CAD thanks the UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections for funding (grant no. HPRU200907).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and source code (Matlab v2021a) for repro- ducing the analyses and figures in this manuscript, as well as for applying the methodology we have developed here are freely available at https://github.com/kpzoo/ information-in-epidemic-curves. We include a template function (in Matlab and R) that can be easily modified to compute our metrics with user-defined noise estimates. https://github.com/kpzoo/information-in-epidemic-curves