PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Agarwal, Arnav
AU  - Albarqouni, Loai
AU  - Badran, Nour
AU  - Brax, Nina
AU  - Gandhi, Pooja
AU  - Pereira, Tiago
AU  - Roberts, Abigail
AU  - Zein, Ola El
AU  - Akl, Elie
TI  - Assessment of concordance between related systematic reviews and between related guideline recommendations: protocol for a methodological survey
AID  - 10.1101/2022.07.11.22277498
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.07.11.22277498
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/12/2022.07.11.22277498.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/12/2022.07.11.22277498.full
AB  - Independent systematic reviewers may arrive at different conclusions when analyzing evidence addressing the same clinical questions. Similarly, independent expert panels may arrive at different recommendations addressing the same clinical topics. When faced with a multiplicity of reviews or guidelines on a given topic, users are likely to benefit from a structured approach to evaluate concordance, and to explain discordant findings and recommendations. This protocol proposes a methodological survey to evaluate the prevalence of concordance between reviews addressing similar clinical questions, and between clinical practice guidelines addressing similar topics; and to identify methodological frameworks for the evaluation of concordance between related reviews and between related guidelines.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.