RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for detection of pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax on chest radiograph
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.07.22277305
DO 10.1101/2022.07.07.22277305
A1 Hillis, James M
A1 Bizzo, Bernardo C
A1 Mercaldo, Sarah
A1 Chin, John K
A1 Newbury-Chaet, Isabella
A1 Digumarthy, Subba R
A1 Gilman, Matthew D
A1 Muse, Victorine V
A1 Bottrell, Georgie
A1 Seah, Jarrel CY
A1 Jones, Catherine M
A1 Kalra, Mannudeep K
A1 Dreyer, Keith J
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/10/2022.07.07.22277305.abstract
AB Importance Early detection of pneumothorax, most often on chest radiograph (CXR), can help determine need for emergent clinical intervention. The ability to accurately detect and rapidly triage pneumothorax with an artificial intelligence (AI) model could assist with earlier identification and improve care.Objective This study aimed to compare the accuracy of an AI model (Annalise Enterprise) to consensus thoracic radiologist interpretations in detecting (1) pneumothorax (incorporating both non-tension and tension pneumothorax) and (2) tension pneumothorax.Design A retrospective standalone performance assessment was conducted on a dataset of 1,000 CXR cases.Setting The cases were obtained from four hospitals in the United States.Participants The cases were obtained from patients aged 18 years or older. They were selected using two strategies from all CXRs performed at the hospitals including inpatients and outpatients. The first strategy identified consecutive pneumothorax cases through a manual review of radiology reports and the second strategy identified consecutive tension pneumothorax cases using natural language processing. For both strategies, negative cases were selected by taking the next negative case acquired from the same x-ray machine. The final dataset was an amalgamation of these processes.Methods Each case was interpreted independently by up to three radiologists to establish consensus ground truth interpretations. Each case was then interpreted by the AI model for the presence of pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax.Main Outcome The primary endpoints were the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the detection of pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax. The secondary endpoints were the sensitivities and specificities for the detection of pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax at predefined operating points.Results Model inference was successfully performed in 307 non-tension pneumothorax, 128 tension pneumothorax and 550 negative cases. The AI model detected pneumothorax with AUC of 0.979 (94.3% sensitivity, 92.0% specificity) and tension pneumothorax with AUC of 0.987 (94.5% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity).Conclusions and Relevance The assessed AI model accurately detected pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax on this CXR dataset. Its use in the clinical workflow could lead to earlier identification and improved care for patients with pneumothorax.Question Does a commercial artificial intelligence model accurately detect simple and tension pneumothorax on chest x-ray?Findings This retrospective study used 1,000 chest x-rays from four hospitals in the United States to compare artificial intelligence model outputs to consensus thoracic radiologist interpretations. The model detected pneumothorax (incorporating both simple and tension pneumothorax) with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.979 and tension pneumothorax with AUC of 0.987. The sensitivity and specificity were 94.3% and 92.0% respectively for pneumothorax, and 94.5% and 95.3% for tension pneumothorax.Meaning This artificial intelligence model could assist radiologists through its accurate detection of pneumothorax.Competing Interest StatementThis study was funded by Annalise-AI. JMH, BCB, SM, JKC, INC, SD, MG, VM, MKK, KD are employees of Mass General Brigham and/or Massachusetts General Hospital, which has received institutional funding from Annalise-AI for the study. GB, JCYS and CMJ are employed by or seconded to Annalise-AI.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Annalise-AI.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Mass General Brigham gave approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe AI model is part of the FDA cleared Annalise Enterprise CXR Triage Pneumothorax device, which is commercially available in the US. The test dataset generated for this study contains protected patient information. Some data may be available for research purposes from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.