RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Neural response to repeated auditory stimuli and its association with early language development in children with Fragile X syndrome
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.05.22277114
DO 10.1101/2022.07.05.22277114
A1 An, Winko W.
A1 Nelson, Charles A.
A1 Wilkinson, Carol L.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/07/2022.07.05.22277114.abstract
AB Background Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent form of inherited intellectual disability and is the most common monogenetic cause of autism. Previous studies have linked the structural and functional alterations in FXS with impaired sensory processing and sensory hypersensitivity, which may hinder the early development of cognitive functions such as language comprehension. In this study, we compared the P1 response in event-related potential (ERP) and its habituation to repeated auditory stimuli in male children (2-7 years old) with and without FXS, and examined their association with clinical measures in these two groups.Methods We collected high-density electroencephalography (EEG) data in an auditory oddball paradigm from 12 children with FXS and 11 age- and sex-matched typically developing (TD) children. After standardized EEG pre-processing, we conducted a spatial principal component (PC) analysis and identified two major PCs — a frontal PC and a temporal PC. Within each PC, we compared the P1 amplitude and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) between the two groups, and performed a series of linear regression analysis to study the association between these EEG measures and several clinical measures, including assessment scores for language development, non-verbal skills, and sensory hypersensitivity.Results At the temporal PC, both early and late standard stimuli evoked a larger P1 response (p = 0.0037, p<0.0001, respectively) and higher ITPC (p = 0.0402, p = 0.0027) in FXS than in TD. We observed habituation of ITPC in both groups at the frontal PC (p = 0.0149 for FXS; p = 0.0244 for TD). Linear regression analysis showed that within the FXS group reduced frontal P1 response to late standard stimuli and increased habituation were associated with better languages scores. No associations were observed with non-verbal skills or sensory hypersensitivity.Conclusion We identified P1 amplitude and ITPC in the temporal region as a contrasting EEG phenotype between the FXS and the TD groups. P1 response and habituation in the frontal region may be reflective of the language outcome in male children with FXS. These EEG measures are potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and future language development in patients with FXS.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by FRAXA Research Foundation, Autism Science Foundation, The Pierce Family Fragile X Foundation, Thrasher Research Fund, Society for Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Harvard Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training Award, the Rosamund Stone Zander Translational Neuroscience Center at Boston Children's Hospital, and the National Institutes of Health (1T32MH112510, 1K23DC017983-01A1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of Boston Children's Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.