PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Brandt, Eric J AU - Hadler, Nicole AU - Locher, Ione AU - Hoffs, Charlie T AU - Waselewski, Marika E AU - Chang, Tammy TI - Online grocery shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic - perspectives of adolescents and young adults AID - 10.1101/2022.06.30.22277101 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.06.30.22277101 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/03/2022.06.30.22277101.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/03/2022.06.30.22277101.full AB - Objective To assess perspectives of online grocery shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic among youth, rural residents, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants.Design Open-ended text message survey data. Survey questions assessed rates of use and perspectives of online grocery shopping among youth and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative analysis of survey data from 875 participants (response rate=76.4%) to identify themes in experience with multivariable logistic regression to test associations between online grocery shopping (pickup, delivery, or either) with rurality and SNAP participation.Setting United StatesParticipants Nationwide text-messaging poll of youth (14-24 years-old) recruited to meet benchmarks based on the American Community Survey.Results During the pandemic online grocery shopping was used frequently (46.7%). Safety and convenience were the primary reasons for preferring a shopping mode (in-person or online). Most online shoppers had positive experiences (59.4%), primarily due to convenience; negative experiences (28.3%) were from inaccuracies, inconveniences of the process, and delivery costs. Rural and suburban residence was associated with higher pickup (OR 2.02 and 1.51, respectively, p=.03) and lower delivery use (OR 0.33 and 0.72, respectively, p=.003) compared to urban residence. SNAP participation was not associated with any type of online grocery shopping.Conclusions Online grocery shopping is common among youth and their families regardless of rurality or SNAP participation, but there are several youth-identified areas for improvement.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research. These funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board, including a waiver of parental consent for minor participantsI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data are held within MyVoice (https://hearmyvoicenow.org/)