PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alhmoud, Baneen
AU  - Melley, Daniel
AU  - khan, Nadeem
AU  - Bonnici, Timothy
AU  - Patel, Riyaz
AU  - Banerjee, Amitava
TI  - Evaluating a novel, integrative dashboard for health professionals’ performance in managing deteriorating patients: <em>quality improvement project</em>
AID  - 10.1101/2022.06.28.22276946
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.06.28.22276946
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/28/2022.06.28.22276946.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/28/2022.06.28.22276946.full
AB  - Background The quality of recording and documentation of deteriorating patient management by health professionals has been challenged at health system level during the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-adherence to monitoring and escalation guidelines and poor documentation increases risk of serious adverse events. Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated dashboards are real-time auditing tools of patients’ status and clinicians’ performance, but neither the views nor the performance of health professionals have been assessed, relating to management of deteriorating patients..Objective To develop and evaluate a real-time dashboard of deteriorating patients’ assessment, referral, and therapy by examining the perception of the dashboard and the performance of nurses and physicians.Settings Five academic hospitals in the largest NHS trust in the UK (Barts Health NHS Trust).Intervention The dashboard was developed from EHR data to investigate patients with NEWS2>5, assessment, and escalation of deteriorating patients. We adopted the Plan, Do, Study, Act model and followed the SQUIRE framework to evaluate the dashboard.Design Mixed methods: (i) Virtual, face-to-face, key informant interviews and (ii) Retrospective descriptive EHR data analysis to measure performance change over time.Results We interviewed 3 nurses (2 quality and safety and 1 informatics specialists). Key themes were: (1) participants perceived the dashboard as a facilitator for auditing NEWS2 recording and escalation of care to improve clinicians practice; (2) There is a need for guiding clinicians and adjusting data sources and metrics which could enhance the functionality and usability. From EHR (2019 to 2022) data analysis showed: (1) NEWS2 recording has gradually improved in the implementation and evaluation phases (May 2021 to Apr 2022) from 64% to 83%; (2) Referral and nurses’ assessment forms completion increased (n: 170 to 6800 & 23 to 540, respectively).Conclusion The deterioration dashboard is an effective real time data-driven method for improving the quality of managing deteriorating patients. Improving the dashboard by integrating multiple health systems, a wider analysis of further NEWS2 and escalation of care metrics, clinicians’ learning of digital solutions will enhance functionality and experience, potentially boosting its value. There is a need to examine the generalizability of the dashboard through further validation and quality improvement studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementBA has received PhD funding from the Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau to conduct the studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study is registered and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) and sponsored by University College London (UCL). The Stanmore Research Ethics Committee (REC) in London approved conducting the study; reference number: 20/PR/0286.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information