RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Birth Weight and Associated Factors among Host and Refugee Neonates at Health Facilities in Gambella Region: A facility based Comparative Cross-sectional Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.27.22276951
DO 10.1101/2022.06.27.22276951
A1 Nhial, Bang Chuol
A1 Wedajo, Shambel
A1 Tadesse, Sisay Eshete
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/27/2022.06.27.22276951.abstract
AB Background Birth weight remains as one of the facing factors and one of the leading causes of child suffering worldwide. This is a major problem especially in low and middle income countries and most importantly in vulnerable populations like refugee. However, there is a limited evident as yet in the study area.Objective The aim of this study was to assess the birth weight and associated factors among host and refugee neonates at health facilities in Gambella Region.Methods A facility based comparative cross-sectional study was applied in host and refugee settings. A total of five hundred ninety six neonates were included in this study from February 1st, 2020 to March 31st, 2020 through multi-stages sampling technique. The data were collected using structured interview and documents review methods with structured questionnaires as instruments. Pretesting of the tool and training of data collectors and field supervision were made. Using statistical package for social science version 25, variables with p≤0.05 from multiple linear regression analysis were declared as factors significantly associated with the birth weight. Furthermore, independent samples t-test was computed to compare the mean birth weights.Results The study resulted in 100% response rate. The mean birth weights were found to be significantly difference between host and refugee neonates with means of 3282.55±415.97 grams and 3109.40±635.10 grams respectively (m1-m2 = 173.15, 95% CI: (86.75, 259.56)). Several factors such as number of fetuses (β = -148.35, 95% CI: (-234.86, -61.83)), gestational age at delivery (β = 90.83, 95% CI: (66.72, 114.93)), household food security status (β = 166.33, 95% CI: (100.68, 231.97)), individual dietary diversity score (β = 88.75, 95% CI: (68.69, 108.81)) and pregnancy induced hypertension (β = -148.35, 95% CI: (-234.86, -61.83)) were found to be the most influential factors significantly associated with the birth weight.Conclusions In the study area, host neonates have larger mean birth weight than the refugee neonates. Number of fetuses, gestational age at delivery, household food security, individual dietary diversity score and pregnancy induced hypertension were factors influencing the birth weight.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNAClinical Protocols NA Funding StatementThis study was funded by Gambella University which did not play any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of manuscriptAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical Review Committee of College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo UniversityI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request NA