PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Yao, Tian AU - Zhang, Xiaohong AU - Mu, Shengcai AU - Guo, Yana AU - Xu, Xiuyang AU - Huo, Junfeng AU - Wei, Zhiyun AU - Liu, Ling AU - Li, Xiaoqing AU - Li, Hong AU - Xing, Rongqin AU - Feng, Yongliang AU - Chen, Jing AU - Feng, Lizhong AU - Wang, Suping TI - Long-term immune persistence induced by two-dose BBIBP-CorV vaccine with different intervals, and immunogenicity and safety of a homologous booster dose in high-risk occupational population Secondary Study Based on a Randomized Clinical Trial AID - 10.1101/2022.06.22.22276690 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.06.22.22276690 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/26/2022.06.22.22276690.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/26/2022.06.22.22276690.full AB - Background BBIBP-CorV vaccine with two doses and an interval of 3-4 weeks had been proved to have good immunogenicity and efficacy as well as an acceptable safety profile according to our initial research and other similar studies. Maintaining adequate neutralizing antibody levels is also necessary for long-term protection, especially in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim was to evaluate the immune persistence of neutralizing antibody elicited by BBIBP-CorV vaccines with day 0-14, 0-21 and 0-28 schedule, and assess the immunogenicity and safety of a homologous booster dose in the high-risk occupational population aged 18-59 years.Methods A total of 809 eligible participants, aged 18-59 years, were recruited and randomly allocated to receive BBIBP-CorV vaccine with day 0-14, 0-21 or 0-28 schedule respectively between January and May 2021 in Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, China among the public security officers and the airport ground staff in initial study. In this secondary study, the responders (GMT ≥ 16) at day 28 after priming two-dose vaccine were followed up at months 3, 6 and 10 to evaluate the immune persistence of three two-dose schedules. At month 10, eligible participants of three two-dose schedules were received a homologous booster dose respectively (hereafter abbreviated as 0-14d-10m group, 0-21d-10m group and 0-28d-10m group), and followed up at day 28 post-booster to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the booster dose. The contents of follow-up included the blood samples, oropharyngeal/nasal swabs, and adverse reactions collection. The main outcomes of the study included geometric mean titers (GMT) of neutralizing antibody to live SARS-CoV-2, the positive rates of different criteria and the constituent ratio of GMT of neutralizing antibodies at different follow-up point. Meanwhile, we explored the kinetics of antibody levels of different vaccination regimens by generalized estimating equations (GEE) and used exponent curve model to predict the duration of maintaining protected antibody after the booster dose. We also determined predictors of maintaining protected antibody level within 10 months after the second dose by Cox proportional hazards regression model and nomogram. The trial was registered with ChiCTR.org.cn (ChiCTR2100041705, ChiCTR2100041706).Results The number of 241, 247 and 256 responders (GMT ≥ 16) at day 28 after two-dose BBIBP-CorV vaccine in 0-14d, 0-21d and 0-28d schedule were followed-up at months 3, 6, and 10 for immune persistence evaluation. At month 10, a total of 390 participants were eligible and received a booster dose with 130 participants in the 0-14d-10m, 0-21d-10m and 0-28d-10m group respectively, of whom 74.1% (289/390) were male, with a mean age of 37.1±10.3 years. The GMT of neutralizing antibody in 0-28d-10m and 0-21d-10m group were significantly higher than 0-14d-10m group at month 3 (GMT: 71.6 & 64.2 vs 46.4, P<0.0001), month 6 (GMT: 47.1 & 42.8 vs 30.5, P < 0.0001) and month 10 (GMT: 32.4 vs 20.3, P < 0.0001; 28.8 vs 20.3, P=0.0004) after the second dose. A sharply decrease by 4.85-fold (GMT: 94.4-20.3), 4.67-fold (GMT: 134.4-28.8) and 4.49-fold (GMT: 145.5-32.4) was observed from day 28 to month 10 after the second dose in 0-14d-10m, 0-21d-10m and 0-28d-10m group, respectively, and they had similar decline kinetics (P=0.67). At 28 days after booster dose, a remarkable rebound in neutralizing antibody (GMT: 246.2, 277.5 and 288.6) were observed in three groups, respectively. Notably, the GMT after booster dose was not affected by priming two-dose schedule. The predictive duration of neutralizing antibody declining to the cutoff level of positive antibody response may be 18.08 months, 18.83 months and 19.08 months after booster dose in three groups, respectively. Long-term immune persistence within 10 months after the second dose was associated with age<40, female, and history of influenza vaccination. All adverse reactions were mild after the booster injection. None of the participants were infected SARS-CoV-2 during the trial period.Conclusions The priming two-dose BBIBP-CorV vaccine with 0-28 days and 0-21 days schedule could lead a longer persistence of neutralizing antibody than 0-14 days schedule. Maintaining long-term immune persistence was also associated with age<40, female, and history of influenza vaccination. Regardless of priming two-doses vaccination regimens, a homologous booster dose led to a strong rebound in neutralizing antibody and might elicit satisfactory persistent immunity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialChiCTR2100041705，ChiCTR2100041706Funding StatementThe study was supported by the COVID-19 Project of Shanxi Provincial Finance, the Project of Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for major infectious disease response, and the COVID-19 Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Shanxi Provincial.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanxi Provincial Center for Disease Control (SXCDCIRBPJ2020056001) and PreventionI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIn this study, the full protocol and the datasets are available, following manuscript publication, upon request from the corresponding author (Professor Suping Wang, supingwang{at}sxmu.edu.cn), following the provision of ethics approval.SARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2;COVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019;GMTGeometric mean titer;CIConfdence interval; BMI: Body mass index;RT-PCRReverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction;WHOWorld Health Organization.