RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Profiling placental DNA methylation associated with maternal SSRI treatment during pregnancy
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.21.22276723
DO 10.1101/2022.06.21.22276723
A1 Inkster, Amy M.
A1 Konwar, Chaini
A1 Peñaherrera, Maria S.
A1 Brain, Ursula
A1 Khan, Almas
A1 Price, E. Magda
A1 Schuetz, Johanna M.
A1 Portales-Casamar, Élodie
A1 Burt, Amber
A1 Marsit, Carmen J.
A1 Vaillancourt, Cathy
A1 Oberlander, Tim F.
A1 Robinson, Wendy P.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/22/2022.06.21.22276723.abstract
AB Background Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), used to treat prenatal maternal depression, have been associated with neurobehavioral disturbances in exposed neonates, though the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. In utero exposure to SSRIs may have an effect on DNA methylation (DNAme) in the human placenta, which is an epigenetic mark that is established during development and is associated with gene expression.Methods Chorionic villus samples from 64 human placentas were profiled with the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip and clinical assessments of maternal mood were collected at multiple time points during pregnancy. Case distribution was 20 SSRI-exposed cases and 44 SSRI non-exposed cases. Maternal depression using a mean maternal Hamilton Depression score >8 to indicate symptomatic depressed mood (“maternally-depressed”) further classified cases into SSRI-exposed, maternally-depressed (n=14); SSRI-exposed, not maternally-depressed (n=6); SSRI non-exposed, maternally-depressed (n=20); and SSRI non-exposed, not maternally-depressed (n=24). To provide a replication cohort, Illumina 450K DNAme profiles were obtained from 34 additional cases from an independent cohort (n=17 SSRI-exposed, n=17 SSRI non-exposed).Results No CpGs were differentially methylated at FDR < 0.05 comparing SSRI-exposed to non-exposed placentas, while adjusting for mean maternal Hamilton Depression score, nor comparing SSRI-exposed maternally-depressed to SSRI-non-exposed maternally-depressed cases. At a relaxed threshold of FDR < 0.25, five CpGs were differentially methylated (|Δβ| > 0.03) by SSRI exposure status. Four of these CpGs were covered by the 450K array and were examined in the replication cohort, but none replicated. Amongst SSRI non-exposed cases, no CpGs were differentially methylated (FDR < 0.25) comparing maternally depressed to not depressed cases. In sex-stratified analyses for SSRI-exposed versus non-exposed cases (females n=31; males n=33), three additional CpGs in females, but none in males, were differentially methylated at the relaxed FDR < 0.25 cut-off.Conclusions We did not observe large-scale alterations of DNAme in placentas exposed to maternal SSRI treatment compared to placentas with no SSRI exposure. We also found no evidence for altered DNAme in maternal depression-exposed versus depression non-exposed placentas. This novel work in a prospectively recruited cohort with clinician-ascertained SSRI exposure and mood assessments would benefit from future replication.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (1R01HD089713-01). Collection of the Discovery Cohort was funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant (MOP-5783). WPR receives salary support through an investigatorship award from the BC Children's Hospital Research Institute. AMI is funded by a Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Doctoral Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of British Columbia Children's Hospital and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia Research Ethics Boards (UBC C&W REB) gave ethical approval for this work (H12-00733, H16-02280).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online under the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number GSE203396.