RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Deep-Learning-Based Generation of Synthetic High-Resolution MRI from Low-Resolution MRI for Use in Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.19.22276611
DO 10.1101/2022.06.19.22276611
A1 Wahid, Kareem A.
A1 Xu, Jiaofeng
A1 El-Habashy, Dina
A1 Khamis, Yomna
A1 Abobakr, Moamen
A1 McDonald, Brigid
A1 O’Connell, Nicolette
A1 Thill, Daniel
A1 Ahmed, Sara
A1 Sharafi, Christina Setareh
A1 Preston, Kathryn
A1 Salzillo, Travis C
A1 Mohamed, Abdallah
A1 He, Renjie
A1 Cho, Nathan
A1 Christodouleas, John
A1 Fuller, Clifton D.
A1 Naser, Mohamed A.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/21/2022.06.19.22276611.abstract
AB Background Quick, low contrast resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are typically acquired for daily MRI-guided radiotherapy setup. However, for patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, these images are often insufficient for discriminating target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). In this study, we investigated a deep learning (DL) approach to generate high-resolution synthetic images from low-resolution images.Methods We used 108 unique HN image sets of paired 2-minute T2-weighted scans (2mMRI) and 6-minute T2-weighted scans (6mMRI). 90 image sets (∼20,000 slices) were used to train a 2-dimensional generative adversarial DL model that utilized 2mMRI as input and 6mMRI as output. Eighteen image sets were used to test model performance. Similarity metrics, including the mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were calculated between normalized synthetic 6mMRI and ground-truth 6mMRI for all test cases. In addition, a previously trained OAR DL auto-segmentation model was used to segment the right parotid gland, left parotid gland, and mandible on all test case images. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were calculated between 2mMRI and either ground-truth 6mMRI or synthetic 6mMRI for each OAR; two one-sided t-tests were applied between the ground-truth and synthetic 6mMRI to determine equivalence. Finally, a Turing test using paired ground-truth and synthetic 6mMRI was performed using three clinician observers; the percentage of images that were correctly identified was compared to random chance using proportion equivalence tests.Results The median similarity metrics across the whole images were 0.19, 0.93, and 33.14 for MSE, SSIM, and PSNR, respectively. The median of DSCs comparing ground-truth vs. synthetic 6mMRI auto-segmented OARs were 0.84 vs. 0.83, 0.82 vs. 0.82, and 0.80 vs. 0.83 for the right parotid gland, left parotid gland, and mandible, respectively (equivalence p<0.05 for all OARs). The percent of images correctly identified was equivalent to chance (p<0.05 for all observers).Conclusions Using 2mMRI inputs, we demonstrate that DL-generated synthetic 6mMRI outputs have high similarity to ground-truth 6mMRI. Our study facilitates the clinical incorporation of synthetic MRI in MRI-guided radiotherapy.Competing Interest StatementC.D.F. has received direct industry grant support, speaking honoraria, and travel funding from Elekta AB. J.X., N.O., D.T., N.C., and J.C. are employees of Elekta AB. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) through a Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA016672-44). K.A.W. is supported by the Dr. John J. Kopchick Fellowship through The University of Texas MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the American Legion Auxiliary Fellowship in Cancer Research, and an NIH/National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) F31 fellowship (1 F31DE031502-01). T.C.S. is supported by The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences TL1 Program (TL1 TR003169). M.A.N. is supported by an NIH grant (R01DE028290-01). C.D.F. received funding from the NIH/NIDCR (1R01DE025248-01/R56DE025248); an NIH/NIDCR Academic-Industrial Partnership Award (R01DE028290); the National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Mathematical Sciences, Joint NIH/NSF Initiative on Quantitative Approaches to Biomedical Big Data (QuBBD) Grant (NSF 1557679); the NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) Program of the NCI Early Stage Development of Technologies in Biomedical Computing, Informatics, and Big Data Science Award (1R01CA214825); the NCI Early Phase Clinical Trials in Imaging and Image-Guided Interventions Program (1R01CA218148); an NIH/NCI Pilot Research Program Award from the UT MD Anderson CCSG Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging Program (P30CA016672); an NIH/NCI Head and Neck Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) Developmental Research Program Award (P50CA097007); and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) Research Education Program (R25EB025787). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data were retrospectively collected from a clinical trial investigating MRI-guided ART (National Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04075305) and an internal volunteer imaging study under HIPAA-compliant protocols approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centers Institutional Review Board (PA18-0341, PA14-1002, RCR03-0800). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll DL inputs and outputs for the test set cases are made publicly available on Figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20099252 (private until manuscript acceptance).