PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Wilson-Aggarwal, Jared K AU - Gotts, Nick AU - Wong, Wai Keong AU - Liddington, Chris AU - Knight, Simon AU - Spyer, Moira J AU - Houlihan, Catherine AU - Nastouli, Eleni AU - Manley, Ed TI - Using routinely collected hospital data to investigate healthcare worker mobility and patient contacts within a UK hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic AID - 10.1101/2022.06.10.22276247 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.06.10.22276247 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/14/2022.06.10.22276247.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/14/2022.06.10.22276247.full AB - Movement and contacts are central to the transmission of infectious diseases and, within the hospital setting, healthcare worker (HCW) mobility and their contact with patients play an important role in the spread of nosocomial disease. Yet data relating to HCW behaviours associated with mobility and contacts in the healthcare environment are often limited. This paper proposes a framework for integrating several electronic data sources routinely-collected by modern hospitals, to enable the measurement of HCW behaviours relevant to the transmission of infections. Using data from a London teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrate how, at an aggregate level, electronic medical records (EMRs) and door access logs can be used to establish changes in HCW mobility and patient contacts. In addition, to show the utility of these data sources in supporting infection prevention and control (IPC), we investigate changes in the indirect connectivity of patients (resulting from shared contacts with HCWs) and spatial connectivity of floors (owing to the movements of HCWs). Average daily rates of patient contacts are computed and found to be higher throughout the pandemic compared to that pre-pandemic, while the average daily rates of HCW mobility remained stable until the second wave, where they surpassed pre-pandemic levels. The response of HCW behaviour to the pandemic was not equal between floors, whereby the highest increases in patient contacts and mobility were on floors handling the majority of COVID-19 patients. The first wave of COVID-19 patients resulted in changes to the flow of HCWs between floors, but the interconnectivity between COVID-19 and non COVID-19 wards was evident throughout the pandemic. Daily rates of indirect contact between patients provided evidence for reactive staff cohorting, whereby indirect contact rates between COVID-19 positive and negative patients were lowest during peaks in COVID-19 hospital admissions. We propose that IPC practitioners use these routinely collected data on HCW behaviour to support infection control activities and to help better protect hospital staff and patients from nosocomial outbreaks of communicable diseases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the UCLH/UCL NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and funding from the UKRI MRC (grant ref: MC_PC_19082), and UCLH Charity.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the NHS Health Research Authority (South Central Berkshire REC ref 20/SC/0147, protocol number 130861) and ethical oversight was provided by the UCLH research ethics committee (IRAS project ID: ref. 281836). UCL GOS ICH R&D approval number 20PL06.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available upon request or via a data repository service after confirmation of acceptance in a peer reviewed journal.