RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Impaired Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Including Omicron Variants after COVID-19 mRNA Booster Immunization under Methotrexate Therapy
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.11.22276272
DO 10.1101/2022.06.11.22276272
A1 Habermann, Elisa
A1 Gieselmann, Lutz
A1 Tober-Lau, Pinkus
A1 Hagen, Alexander ten
A1 Albach, Fredrik N
A1 Zernicke, Jan
A1 Ahmadov, Elvin
A1 de Silva, Amanthi Nadira Arumahandi
A1 Frommert, Leonie Maria
A1 Klotsche, Jens
A1 Kurth, Florian
A1 Sander, Leif Erik
A1 Burmester, Gerd
A1 Klein, Florian
A1 Biesen, Robert
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/14/2022.06.11.22276272.abstract
AB Objective To determine the immediate need for a fourth COVID-19 vaccination based on the neutralizing capacity in patients on methotrexate (MTX) therapy after mRNA booster immunization.Methods In this observational cohort study, neutralizing serum activity against SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (Wu01) and variant of concern (VOC) Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 were assessed by pseudovirus neutralization assay before, 4 and 12 weeks after mRNA booster immunization in 50 rheumatic patients on MTX, 26 of whom paused the medication. 44 non-immunosuppressed persons (NIP) served as control group.Results While the neutralizing serum activity against SARS-CoV-2 Wu01 and Omicron variants increased 67-to 73-fold in the NIP after booster vaccination, the serum activity in patients receiving MTX increased only 20-to 23-fold. As a result, significantly lower neutralizing capacities were measured in patients on MTX compared to the NIP at week 4. Patients who continued MTX treatment during vaccination had significantly lower neutralizing serum titres against all three virus strains at week 4 and 12 compared to patients who paused MTX and the control group, except for BA.2 at week 12. Patients who paused MTX reached comparably high neutralization titres as the NIP, except for Wu01 at week 12. Neutralization of omicron variants was significantly lower in comparison to wildtype in both groups.Conclusion Patients pausing MTX showed a similar vaccine response to NIP. Patients who continued MTX demonstrated an impaired booster response indicating a potential benefit of a second booster vaccination.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by unconditional donations from Medac, Galapagos and Freunde und Foerderer der Berliner Charite e.V. This work was supported by grants from COVIM: NaFoUniMedCovid19 (FKZ: 01KX2021) (to L.E.S. and F.Kl.), the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (V-2021.3 / 1503_68403 / 2021-2022) (to F.Ku. and L.E.S.). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was ethically approved by the Regional Office for Health and Social Affairs Berlin, Germany (21/0098-IV E 13). All patients provided written informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the article. Data are available on reasonable request.