RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Protocol: A two-wave cross-sectional study in England investigating suicidal behaviour and self-harm amongst healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.16.21263255
DO 10.1101/2021.09.16.21263255
A1 Padmanathan, Prianka
A1 Lamb, Danielle
A1 Scott, Hannah
A1 Wessely, Simon
A1 Moran, Paul
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/13/2021.09.16.21263255.abstract
AB Introduction There have been longstanding concerns regarding an increased risk of suicide amongst healthcare workers. The Covid-19 pandemic has placed an additional burden on staff, yet few studies have investigated the impact of the pandemic on their risk of suicide and self-harm. We aimed to investigate the cumulative incidence, prevalence, and correlates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury amongst healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic.Methods and Analysis NHS Check is an online survey that was distributed to all staff (clinical and non-clinical), students, and volunteers in 18 NHS Trusts across England during the Covid-19 pandemic. Data collected in wave 1 (collected between April 2020 and January 2021) and wave 2 (collected 6 months after wave 1) will be analysed. The full cohort of wave 1 participants will be weighted to represent the age, sex, ethnicity, and roles profile of the workforce at each Trust, and the weighted prevalence and cumulative incidence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury will be described. Two-level random effects logistic regression models will be used to investigate the relationship between suicidal behaviour and self-harm, and demographic characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity) and workplace factors (concerns regarding access to personal protective equipment, re-deployment status, moral injury, confidence around raising and the management of safety concerns, support by supervisors or managers, satisfaction with standard of care provided). Results will be stratified by role (clinical/non-clinical).Changes in this protocol compared with the original versionAll variables describing workplace factors will be analysed as binary variables for consistency.The responses to two questions on raising, and the management of, safety concerns will be analysed separately rather than combined to minimise loss of information.Binary suicide-related outcomes will be used in the logistic regression analyses, where the presence of an outcome represents its occurrence within the previous one (wave 2) or two months (wave 1), specifically. This was previously not specified.Competing Interest StatementSW is an Emeritus NIHR Senior Investigator, and Director of the NIHR PHE Health Protection Research Unit into Emergency Preparedness and Response. This paper represents independent research part-funded by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre Trust and King's College London. SW acknowledges receiving speaker fees for two seminars, on Mental health impacts of COVID-19, for employees of Swiss Re. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.Funding StatementFunding for NHS CHECK has been received from the following sources: Medical Research Council (MR/V034405/1); UCL/Wellcome (ISSF3/ H17RCO/C3); Rosetrees (M952); Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V009931/1); as well as seed funding from National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King's College London. PP has a PhD Clinical Fellowship funded by the MRC Addiction Research Clinical Training programme [MR/N00616X/1] during the conduct of this study. PM is part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and also receives salary support from Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust. DL is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaborative North Thames (NIHR ARC North Thames). This funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics and Dissemination Ethical approval for the NHS Check study was granted by the Health Research Authority (reference: 20/HRA/210, IRAS: 282686) and local Trust Research and Development approval.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAccess to study data by researchers may be possible on application to the chief investigators of NHS Check.